Page 1 of 1
bid these
#2
Posted 2011-February-12, 22:50
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
5♦ - 5♠
Pass
or more likely:
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
4N - 5♦
5♥ - 6♦
6♠ - Pass
4♣ - 4♠
5♦ - 5♠
Pass
or more likely:
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
4N - 5♦
5♥ - 6♦
6♠ - Pass
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#3
Posted 2011-February-12, 23:43
Agree with 1♥-1♠-4♣. East might try 4♦ next but a stiff heart and only four trumps mean 12 tricks will take some work. You need at least AKxx Axxxx AQx x and it is still not cold. So probably 4♠ is best.
After that if East bids 4♠ I would definitely pass with West. If East bids 4♦ you probably reach slam which is not terrible but you'd prefer not to be there.
After that if East bids 4♠ I would definitely pass with West. If East bids 4♦ you probably reach slam which is not terrible but you'd prefer not to be there.
#4
Posted 2011-February-13, 00:12
I don't think I could bring myself to pass the West hand after 4♠, perhaps that's a case for 1♥-1♠-3♦ (or 1♥-1♠-2♣ if you're Ken Rexford).
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#6
Posted 2011-February-13, 05:10
4♣ is an underbid but I don't like alternatives (fake 3♦).
4♦/4♣ would be exagerated I think : a lot of work to do (including the real hand) ! Hence 4♠.
Over 4♠ we have far more chances to find a weakish hand that means danger in 5♠ than the good hand for slam. Hence West makes a statistical Pass.
This is imho one of the tribute to pay to very wide range 1♥ openings if you don't have the artificial arsenal to cope with "end of the spectrum hands".
FD
#7
Posted 2011-February-13, 05:09
What has happened to splinters? West has a maximum splinter, but I don't understand driving to the 5-level if partner sign's off in 4♠. Basically forcing to slam (with RKCB) seems really too much.
East's decision seems closer, but 4♠ seems right.
East's decision seems closer, but 4♠ seems right.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#8
Posted 2011-February-13, 13:12
cherdano, on 2011-February-13, 05:09, said:
What has happened to splinters? West has a maximum splinter, but I don't understand driving to the 5-level if partner sign's off in 4♠. Basically forcing to slam (with RKCB) seems really too much.
East's decision seems closer, but 4♠ seems right.
East's decision seems closer, but 4♠ seems right.
Agree with this. A two-tiered splinter over 1♥ - 1♠ would be nice.
Hi y'all!
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2011-February-13, 19:30
1♥-1♠-2N-3♣-4♣-4♠
2N=GF unbalanced
3♣=relay
4♣=4531/4621
4♠=not interested
I suspect the big hand gives up now, but it's close, certainly stops in 5♠ rather than bidding 6 if it does continue.
2N=GF unbalanced
3♣=relay
4♣=4531/4621
4♠=not interested
I suspect the big hand gives up now, but it's close, certainly stops in 5♠ rather than bidding 6 if it does continue.
#10
Posted 2011-February-13, 21:39
mtvesuvius, on 2011-February-12, 22:50, said:
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
5♦ - 5♠
Pass
or more likely:
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
4N - 5♦
5♥ - 6♦
6♠ - Pass
4♣ - 4♠
5♦ - 5♠
Pass
or more likely:
1♥ - 1♠
4♣ - 4♠
4N - 5♦
5♥ - 6♦
6♠ - Pass
So basically you are accepting your own invitation ?
And what if partner really have wasted ♣ hcps and signed off in 4♠, lets exchange his ♦ KJ to ♣ suit, he will bid exactly same when u aks keycards and ending up at 5 level on first example and in slam on second with 3 losers nowhere to park.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#11
Posted 2011-February-14, 06:52
The other table can't stop below 6S.
Need S:3-2 + DQ onside + no freak D:5-0. My luck they'll make.
Opponents silent with their clubs ups the odds their shape is tame.
Still hate losing a swing on this type of hand.
Need S:3-2 + DQ onside + no freak D:5-0. My luck they'll make.
Opponents silent with their clubs ups the odds their shape is tame.
Still hate losing a swing on this type of hand.
#12
Posted 2011-February-14, 16:29
2C( we open lighter 2C than most) 2D(GF)
2H 2S(H<=2)
2N(H>=5) 3D(4+)
3S(4+) 4C(Some kind of slam interest in S)
4D(Cue) 4S(enough)
pass
2H 2S(H<=2)
2N(H>=5) 3D(4+)
3S(4+) 4C(Some kind of slam interest in S)
4D(Cue) 4S(enough)
pass
Page 1 of 1

Help
