After partner's balancing Playing MP
#1
Posted 2004-September-07, 17:55
♠AQx
♥AQxxx
♦KQx
♣xx
pass* - 2♥** - pass - pass
2♠ - pass - ???
* You are playing standard weak-2, sometimes with 5 cards (if good 5431 hand)
** Hearts+minor, weak
#2
Posted 2004-September-07, 18:06
4S might be too unilateral, same for 3nt... oh well
#3
Posted 2004-September-07, 18:18
I'm bidding 4S.
This should play very well, even opposite the expected heart void...
#4
Posted 2004-September-07, 18:50
Why did I pass on the first round? Was I called to the phone and the drink waiter held my cards?
#5
Posted 2004-September-07, 19:05
Now I agree with 4S. It seems almost impossible that partner has chances for 6 (besides, it's too late to describe my hand anyway), while even the worst hand should have a shot at game.
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2004-September-08, 01:06
I interested what mean these bids (2NT, 3♣,3♦,3♥,3♠) by your system.
BTW I don't like East's pass too, but however ...
Stefan
#7
Posted 2004-September-08, 02:01
#8
Posted 2004-September-08, 02:14
#9
Posted 2004-September-08, 04:27
#10
Posted 2004-September-08, 04:41
#11
Posted 2004-September-08, 04:48
#13
Posted 2004-September-08, 05:00
skorchev, on Sep 8 2004, 08:06 AM, said:
I interested what mean these bids (2NT, 3♣,3♦,3♥,3♠) by your system.
Hi!
2NT = natural, invitational to 3NT
3m = probably to play (not agreed)
3♥ = spade raise, better than 3♠
3♠ = spade raise, invitational in this sequence ("bid game with max")
3NT = natural, to play
#14
Posted 2004-September-08, 06:30
#15
Posted 2004-September-08, 07:22
KTxxx
x
Axx
xxxx
and this offers reasonable play for 4S.
#16
Posted 2004-September-08, 07:35
whereagles, on Sep 8 2004, 03:22 PM, said:
KTxxx
x
Axx
xxxx
and this offers reasonable play for 4S.
i don't think that's abundantly clear... i passed hoping for xx with a 17 count... weak 2 opener can easily have 9, 10 hcp... his partner can also easily have 12, 13 count.. it's *very* possible my pard has a queen period...
i agree with fluffy, which is why i said 4S or 3nt might be a tad unilateral... 3H seems the best bid, if it isn't understood as nt look... it should say you have support and would like to go higher than 3S, but you aren't sure of his hand
#17
Posted 2004-September-08, 07:37
Fluffy, on Sep 8 2004, 07:30 AM, said:
Agree with you but I assume that partner is not able to judge himself because there are a lot of weak hands that lead to game, so I just bid it !
#18
Posted 2004-September-08, 07:42
KTxxx
x
xxx
xxxx
don't you think he might have passed 2H for a possible +150, instead of trying for +110, which runs the risk of hearing pard bid 4S and go -50?
In the auction
p 2H p p
2S p 3H p
??
unless in your style KTxxx x Axx xxxx is a clear-cut 4S reply to the 3H cue, an immediate 4S is perhaps better than the cue.
But then again, as I said, to invite or just bid 4S is a matter of style.
#19
Posted 2004-September-08, 07:56
Kxxxx
xx
Axxxx
x
Gives him a great play for 6.
Unless your partners protect on Kxxxx and out, this is a 4S bid.
#20
Posted 2004-September-08, 09:49
Free, on Sep 8 2004, 03:01 AM, said:
And would anyone pass 3S if partner bid it?

Help
