The_Hog, on Aug 28 2004, 09:45 AM, said:
If you would raise to 3 over a 2N opening you will lose more than you gain Jimmy.
The point is that you have so many controls the hand is too strong for a 2N opening. This hand has a chance for 4S opposite.
xxxx
x
xxxx
xxxx
The point is that you have so many controls the hand is too strong for a 2N opening. This hand has a chance for 4S opposite.
xxxx
x
xxxx
xxxx
probably right, ron... but vul at imps i'd still do it... i've seen too many 23, 24 hcp hands make 3nt, and the game bonus makes it worth the shot (imho)
as for the hand you posted, how would they find the (possibly making) 4/4 spade game? over 2C i imagine pard bids 2D (or 2H if neg), and if opener bids 2NT i can't see responder looking... but maybe he would.. a zero count opposite a known 23, 24 seems every bit as dangerous as a 21, 22 count opposite paulhar's hypothetical 3 count, maybe moreso since there are no entries even possible
and remember, i'm not even hinting that 2C is wrong or even that it isn't the best bid (too many of you, good players all, would bid it... so saying that would be *extremely* arrogant and dogmatic), just that i'd probably open 2NT

Help

s
t
r-m
nd
ing) tr. v. - Any bid made by bridge player with which partner disagrees.