BBO Discussion Forums: rebid control - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

rebid control 1st con trol OR 1st and 2nd?

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2010-December-17, 11:58

This question comes from another post:
If you play Italian controls (1st and 2nd controls) and you rebid a control is that generally showing?:
- 1st control; or (Ax. or void)
- 1st and 2nd control (A, AK or void)
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,391
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-December-17, 12:01

First and second round control
Alderaan delenda est
0

#3 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2010-December-17, 12:05

First and Second... Keycard is usually fine otherwise
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#4 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2010-December-17, 15:37

1st and 2nd seems to be standard.
I never realised this (I should check this with my partner).
...Maybe you don't need 1st only because RKC can cover these. If anyone has seen an explanation for this preference then I would be interested.
0

#5 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-December-18, 09:20

Repeat says 'first wasn't Zia control'.
0

#6 User is offline   cherdano 

  • 5555
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,516
  • Joined: 2003-September-04
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-December-18, 10:30

Wrong forum.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
2

#7 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-December-18, 10:32

AK or void, I try not to with stiff ace if I have an alternative
0

#8 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2010-December-18, 10:58

View Postcherdano, on 2010-December-18, 10:30, said:

Wrong forum.

What forum should I have used?
0

#9 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-December-18, 19:03

Actually, it depends...

If the control bid is truly a side control situation (neither a suit you already showed or one that partner already showed), then IMO the only assured thing is first round.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#10 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2010-December-20, 08:43

This is what I found in an old document (1990) of Claudio Petroncini and Giorgio Belladonna:

Quote

Repeating one’s cue-bid that had not specified the type of control or making a cue-bid in a suit skipped by partner confirms 1st-round control in the suit

Quote

Skipping a suit, in which the player has shown a control directly (with a cue-bid) or indirectly (continuing the dialogue despite partner have denied a control in the suit), specifies 2nd-round control only of the suit skipped

Is this old or is it played differently in Italy...?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users