BBO Discussion Forums: Cards of a Different Color Revisited - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Cards of a Different Color Revisited A first for me

#1 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2010-December-12, 16:21

What's your plan?


If you pass, partner will double. If you bid something, partner will probably bid NT.

Edit: Over 3 partner will be 3N, your call now?
If you bid 4 partner will pass I guess

This post has been edited by mtvesuvius: 2010-December-12, 17:28

Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#2 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2010-December-12, 16:32

I would pass and pass the double. I don't see what we're supposed to make. I guess I would probably lead a diamond.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-December-12, 17:21

I'm not keen on defending 2x, which seems to be an 8- or 9-card fit.

Hearts might play OK - I can use partner's minor-suit entries to take spade ruffs, then exit and wait for a few more trump tricks. A likely problem is that RHO is 4-6 in the majors and can ruff one of partner's minor-suit winners. Hence I'll just bid 3. Afterwards I'll explain to partner why it's non-forcing.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-December-12, 18:26

I detest defending 2 x'd. I want to play 3, and I think a direct 3 is too encouraging. Partner sounds like a 40(54) or something close with the pass of the xx.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#5 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-December-12, 21:44

See how much trouble they get into with H:Q9xxx weak2?
0

#6 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2010-December-13, 03:59

 dake50, on 2010-December-12, 21:44, said:

See how much trouble they get into with H:Q9xxx weak2?


Not really.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#7 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2010-December-13, 04:01

 gnasher, on 2010-December-12, 17:21, said:

I'm not keen on defending 2x, which seems to be an 8- or 9-card fit.

Hearts might play OK - I can use partner's minor-suit entries to take spade ruffs, then exit and wait for a few more trump tricks. A likely problem is that RHO is 4-6 in the majors and can ruff one of partner's minor-suit winners. Hence I'll just bid 3. Afterwards I'll explain to partner why it's non-forcing.


Unless it makes 10 tricks. Then we explain to partner why he should have raised. :P
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#8 User is offline   han 

  • Under bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,797
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Posted 2010-December-13, 07:52

Pass and pull to 3H.
Please note: I am interested in boring, bog standard, 2/1.

- hrothgar
0

#9 User is offline   rogerclee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,214
  • Joined: 2007-December-16
  • Location:Pasadena, CA

Posted 2010-December-13, 12:17

You won't believe what just happened to me. My opponent sat for 2S doubled holding an amazing 7 card suit and a spade void and zero defense in a situation where his partner would double 2S with a wide variety of hands, most of which are not even close to beating 2S in his own hand.
0

#10 User is offline   MrAce 

  • VIP Member
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,971
  • Joined: 2009-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Houston, TX

Posted 2010-December-13, 13:43

 rogerclee, on 2010-December-13, 12:17, said:

You won't believe what just happened to me. My opponent sat for 2S doubled holding an amazing 7 card suit and a spade void and zero defense in a situation where his partner would double 2S with a wide variety of hands, most of which are not even close to beating 2S in his own hand.


Letme guess, they beat 2 and they were not making anything ? :)
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"

"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."





0

#11 User is offline   l milne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 107
  • Joined: 2010-October-29

Posted 2010-December-13, 14:04

No way I'm putting partner through the misery of collecting 6 tricks on defense, when opps have a probably 9-card fit, when I have nothing to help him out with, that's for sure.

I'm tempted by pass and 2NT, try to play a 5-3 minor fit. Might play quite well. Obviously pass and rip to 3 is also an option.
0

#12 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2010-December-13, 14:15

 rogerclee, on 2010-December-13, 12:17, said:

a situation where his partner would double 2S with a wide variety of hands, most of which are not even close to beating 2S in his own hand.


While I admit that I've reconsidered my original pass, I still strongly disagree with this statement. We're the ones who should be doubling 2s with a wide variety of hands on this auction, since our hand is more unknown than partner's. To me passing 2s really screams that I have hearts and nothing else, though of course it need not be quite this pure. So I think after our pass partner should only double with very good spades, though perhaps this hand is still too extreme to sit.
0

#13 User is offline   olien 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 236
  • Joined: 2008-March-06

Posted 2010-December-14, 13:51

so, I was Adam's partner and I had:

KTxxx
----
AKxx
AT8x

I doubled 2, over his pull to 3 I bid 3NT, and Adam went to 4 which I passed.
10 tricks were there for the taking despite being 7-6-0-0 around the table.
0

#14 User is offline   mgoetze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,942
  • Joined: 2005-January-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cologne, Germany
  • Interests:Sleeping, Eating

Posted 2010-December-14, 15:50

 olien, on 2010-December-14, 13:51, said:

I doubled 2, over his pull to 3 I bid 3NT, and Adam went to 4 which I passed.


One might also mention that 4 was doubled. ;)
"One of the painful things about our time is that those who feel certainty are stupid, and those with any imagination and understanding are filled with doubt and indecision"
    -- Bertrand Russell
0

#15 User is offline   mtvesuvius 

  • Vesuvius the Violent Volcano
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,216
  • Joined: 2008-December-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Tampa-Area, Florida
  • Interests:SLEEPING

Posted 2010-December-14, 16:54

 mgoetze, on 2010-December-14, 15:50, said:

One might also mention that 4 was doubled. ;)

Yes, one might :)

Thanks for posting the hand, Owen, I was feeling lazy, was gonna post it up eventually though lol
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
0

#16 User is offline   olien 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 236
  • Joined: 2008-March-06

Posted 2010-December-15, 11:17

Oh yes, but when it was doubled, and my partner passed by my partner, why would I now change my mind?

xD
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users