MP
your bid#2
#1
Posted 2010-December-10, 17:48
MP
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#2
Posted 2010-December-10, 18:54
#3
Posted 2010-December-13, 00:28
If this hand is a game force, you can't double and then pass 3♦. Besides not being game, this will often be a 5-2 fit (maybe even a 4-2 fit). Certainly you could double and then bid 3♠, or bid 3♠ directly.
If this hand is not a game force, then 3♣ is a spot-on description, showing extras but NF. My preference is the 3♣ call; 3NT will not make opposite a pretty good partner hand like ♠Kxx ♥Jx ♦KQxx ♣xxxx. You might make 5♣ (or even 4♥), but good luck getting there if you start with double or 3♠.
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#4
Posted 2010-December-13, 05:20
I would bid 3C on hands that are much weaker, and typically more shapely.
- hrothgar
#6
Posted 2010-December-13, 10:19
jillybean, on 2010-December-10, 17:48, said:
MP
looked at the auction funny (I saw 1♥ (1NT) 2♠ (P). So for the real auction I could live with either X or 3♣
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2010-December-13, 11:18
#8
Posted 2010-December-13, 11:34
3♣ is just competitive and weaker.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#9
Posted 2010-December-13, 13:27
I don't like any of my choices, but double simply begs for 3♦ over which the only thing I can be sure of is that we're worse off than had I bid 3♣.
If partner bids 3♦ over my 3♣, I will know he has 6+ and I will try a gentle probe with 3♠.
Note that if he bids 3♥ over 3♣, this should be weak...a limit raise should bid 4♥.
This is not a gf. I don't actually think it was ever a gf...I was going to bid 2N had rho passed, not 3♣. So I won't let their bidding, which devalues my hand, make me upgrade it, and I can't bid 2N anymore.
This would be a lot tougher at imps, especially red.
#10
Posted 2010-December-13, 14:23
mikeh, on 2010-December-13, 13:27, said:
I don't like any of my choices, but double simply begs for 3♦ over which the only thing I can be sure of is that we're worse off than had I bid 3♣.
I don't get this comment, I wouldn't know I was worse off until I saw the full hand.
- hrothgar
#11
Posted 2010-December-13, 15:36
han, on 2010-December-13, 14:23, said:
sorry...too many literalists here, I guess. Too bad there isn't a smiley to indicate intentional use of hyperbole....I would have used it. I had hoped that it was obvious.

Help
