Italian Championships - Angelini team disqualified Too many non-residents
#1
Posted 2010-December-04, 10:53
#5
Posted 2010-December-04, 12:35
-- Bertrand Russell
#6
Posted 2010-December-04, 13:08
downagain, on 2010-December-04, 12:25, said:
Never seen that before
LOVE IT!
Really need to start using it at work...
(Especially when the Application Engineers asks nonsensical questions)
#7
Posted 2010-December-04, 18:08
kfay, on 2010-December-04, 11:57, said:
I do understand what hubris means, but I don't understand what you mean. Who do you think was displaying it, the team that played ineligible players, or the team that filed the challenge?
#8
Posted 2010-December-04, 18:13
#9
Posted 2010-December-04, 18:16
#10
Posted 2010-December-04, 18:34
Elianna, on 2010-December-04, 18:08, said:
I'd guess kfay is implying that the team that was DQed was aware of a regulation, disregarded it thinking they could strongarm/sweettalk/wiggle their way out of whatever problems arose?
#11
Posted 2010-December-04, 19:04
matmat, on 2010-December-04, 18:34, said:
Precisely.
I mean... how can you have a captain with such a record as well as some of the top bridge players in the world and not be aware of the rules for the competition in which you are playing? To me it seems that Angelini likely was aware or suspected but who would put up a fuss over having such an exciting team in the competition as well as challenge one of the 2 most powerful bridge personalities in Italy?
#12
Posted 2010-December-04, 19:10
---
As a side note in the USA in some sports teams have lost their Nat championship months or a year later after the fact because of ineligible players.
#13
Posted 2010-December-05, 02:29
For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site.
#14
Posted 2010-December-05, 05:03
paulg, on 2010-December-05, 02:29, said:
For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site.
wow...excellent...ty for link.
#15
Posted 2010-December-05, 10:25
paulg, on 2010-December-05, 02:29, said:
For nige1's benefit, the background to the complaint and at least one reason for delay (it was eventually given to the Italian Olympic Committee by the bridge authorities) is covered in a previous post on the Neapolitan Club site.
#16
Posted 2010-December-05, 18:23
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#17
Posted 2010-December-07, 06:32
- R. Buckminster Fuller
#18
Posted 2010-December-08, 23:07
ulven, on 2010-December-07, 06:32, said:
So how does Italian nat. bridge org. respond...or are they silent?
Even more important I assume that everyday italian bridge players own/control italy bridge...what are they doing....silent?? nothing??
The owners/members of Italy bridge need to step up and take control or take full blame.

Help
