Page 1 of 1
Squeeze Classification Is there such a thing as a Fratricidal Criss-Cross Squeeze?
#1
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:16
On this hand I had a pseudo-fratricidal-criss cross squeeze. It struck me while playing the hand that this couldn't be a sure thing since the opponent decided which suit to lead (in general) and so it should never be more than just "pseudo". But I was wondering if the squeeze fiends had thought about this or considered the possibility.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#2
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:19
It is just a pseudo squeeze really, West could have chucked diamonds without cost. When a squeeze like that occurs for real, it's called a Suicide Squeeze I believe.
suicide squeeze
suicide squeeze
Wayne Somerville
#3
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:36
manudude03, on 2011-February-08, 17:19, said:
It is just a pseudo squeeze really, West could have chucked diamonds without cost. When a squeeze like that occurs for real, it's called a Suicide Squeeze I believe.
suicide squeeze
suicide squeeze
Yes, I know it was just a "pseudo" squeeze (see OP). I don't know if this is always called Suicide, or Fratricide, or if they are the same thing. My question is whether it is possible to have a criss-cross squeeze in a suicide situation. This one is such a squeeze, but is only "pseudo", and it strikes me that if such a non-pseudo squeeze position existed, it would be interesting.
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#4
Posted 2011-February-08, 17:58
I don't think a suicide criss-cross squeeze can exist. The essence of a criss-cross squeeze is that you have to choose whether to cash an honor in hand or in dummy first. This can't work when an opponent is on lead.
The easiest way to count losers is to line up the people who talk about loser count, and count them. -Kieran Dyke
#5
Posted 2011-February-08, 18:28
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
#6
Posted 2011-February-08, 18:33
gnasher, on 2011-February-08, 18:28, said:
That's great! You take care of the "not having the lead" issue that cherdano mentioned by having 2 high honors in each hand. Very cute!
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
#7
Posted 2011-February-11, 06:35
The lead could just as easily be in either N or South - they can play a diamond themselves.
Squeezes where the squeeze card is a loser are basically magic imo.
Squeezes where the squeeze card is a loser are basically magic imo.
The physics is theoretical, but the fun is real. - Sheldon Cooper
#8
Posted 2011-February-11, 07:48
oh ignore that. i was talking bollocks - east has no clubs to cut declarer's entry.
Page 1 of 1

Help
