BBO Discussion Forums: Kokish - rebid after - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Kokish - rebid after Follow-on bidding after a 2C opening and Kokish relais.

#1 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-13, 04:17

Playing "default" 2/1 ,as defined in the BridgeWorld_Standard, with Kokish relais:

How would you differentiate between the following sequences ?

2 2
2 2
3

and:
2 2
3

what clues are there for that in the BWS2001-document ?
Bob Herreman
-4

#2 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,688
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-November-13, 05:42

The first sequence just shows a heart 1-suiter. The second sequence appears to be undefined. Where a bid is undefined it should be interpreted as natural. Natural in this context would mean a self-supporting suit and set hearts as trumps.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#3 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,512
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2010-November-13, 06:27

First part shows game force with H. Part 2 shows 4H and 6D.
0

#4 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,670
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2010-November-13, 07:15

Quote

Slow arrival: Except where there is a specific agreement to the contrary, when there is a choice between two game-forcing bids in a particular strain, BWS uses “slow arrival” (a jump is either stronger than a simple bid or it is a “picture bid” with a specific descriptive meaning).

I suppose you could agree either of the two previously mentioned meanings and still fall within this paragraph. I prefer Zel's, but that's just my opinion.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
1

#5 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-13, 13:48

View Postblackshoe, on 2010-November-13, 07:15, said:

I suppose you could agree either of the two previously mentioned meanings and still fall within this paragraph. I prefer Zel's, but that's just my opinion.


Agreed, provided that "slow arrival" is applicable. But, are both sequences necessary GF ? ( a condition needed to have that principle applied ).

Besides I have difficulties understanding that principle, the way it is written down in BWS2001: a jump, is quicker, not slower; and would be more strong ? Can somebody enlighten me ?

Using the other default: "when a bid could be natural, it is", I incline for:

2 2
3 as natural and an invite, to partner, if he is not completely minimum (1 trick), to bid game.

As a corolarry
2 2
2 2
3 would be GF, with a superhand.

Would that be an acceptable interpretation, or am I stretching too much ?
Bob Herreman
-4

#6 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,688
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-November-13, 14:08

The 2C opening is GF except for the sequence 2C - 2D - 2NT. It is possible to bundle major suit Acol 2s into 2C but that is not part of BWS. It is better to play 2H as an immediate double negative (non-forcing) when using this method.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#7 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-14, 01:41

View PostZelandakh, on 2010-November-13, 14:08, said:

The 2C opening is GF except for the sequence 2C - 2D - 2NT. It is possible to bundle major suit Acol 2s into 2C but that is not part of BWS. It is better to play 2H as an immediate double negative (non-forcing) when using this method.


Is 2 really always GF ? Or can it hide "Acol2 hands" (8 or 9 playing tricks) ?

BWS2001 doucument, para IV D said:

After a two-diamond response and a natural simple new-suit rebid by opener, responder's cheapest minor-suit bid through three diamonds is a double negative (after which opener's same-suit rebid of three of a major may be passed), new-suit single jump is a splinter raise, and double raise is a picture bid (strong trumps and little else).

According this:

2 2
2 3=double negative
3 may now be passed.

But what if the opener's color is . That is were I think the two earlier discussed sequences could be usefull.

Please comment. Thank you.
Bob Herreman
-3

#8 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-November-14, 07:52

View PostZelandakh, on 2010-November-13, 05:42, said:

The first sequence just shows a heart 1-suiter. The second sequence appears to be undefined. Where a bid is undefined it should be interpreted as natural. Natural in this context would mean a self-supporting suit and set hearts as trumps.


and demand qbidding start.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
1

#9 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-14, 08:16

Putting it all together, I agree with Zelandakh:

2 2
2 2
3may be passed (the 2club opene has the direct 3 and 4 availble to show other hands.

and:
2 2
3 Is GF, setting H as trumps, and asking to start a cue-bid sequence.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Bob Herreman
-4

#10 User is offline   Zelandakh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,688
  • Joined: 2006-May-18
  • Gender:Not Telling

Posted 2010-November-14, 08:38

The 2C - 2D - 2H - 2S - 3H and 2C - 2D - 2S - 3C - 3S sequences should not be passable in BWS. Opener can still hold a rock-crusher here and is exploring for the best fit. The "2D wait, 2H natural positive" method does not work well with the scheme where 2C can contain a major suit Acol 2. The 3m double negative option is more of a warning to Opener not to expect any help in a future slam probe.
(-: Zel :-)
0

#11 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-14, 09:00

YES, sorry, made a mistake.... it should read:

Putting it all together, I agree with Zelandakh:

2 2
2 3 =double Negative
3 may be passed (the 2club opener has the direct 3 and 4 available to show other hands.) (the BWS2001 is very explicit)

and:
2 2
3 Is GF, setting H as trumps, and asking to start a cue-bid sequence.
Bob Herreman
-2

#12 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,670
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2010-November-14, 14:06

If you're playing Kokish Relay, responder cannot bid 3 after opener's 2, he must bid 2. So there is no "second negative".
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
1

#13 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-14, 23:34

Oh yes, got it wrong again:

use of double negative:

2 2
2 3
3 .... can now be passed

and similar


2 2
2 2
3 may be passed

and as a consequence
2 2
3 Is GF, setting H as trumps, and asking to start a cue-bid sequence.

Does all this make sence ?
Bob Herreman
-2

#14 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,670
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2010-November-15, 04:36

As I understand Kokish Relay, the 3 bid in your sequence is still forcing.

Frankly, I think if you have a suit-oriented hand with which you are not willing to force to game, you should probably not open it 2.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#15 User is offline   Lurpoa 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 324
  • Joined: 2010-November-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Cogitatio 40
  • Interests:SEF
    BBOAdvanced2/1
    2/1 LC
    Benjamized Acol
    Joris Acol
    Fantunes
    George's K Squeeze

Posted 2010-November-15, 06:45

View Postblackshoe, on 2010-November-15, 04:36, said:

As I understand Kokish Relay, the 3 bid in your sequence is still forcing.

Frankly, I think if you have a suit-oriented hand with which you are not willing to force to game, you should probably not open it 2.



There is probably a lot of truth in what you are saying. But comming back to the initial question: what difference is there between the two sequences ?
Bob Herreman
-3

#16 User is offline   blackshoe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,670
  • Joined: 2006-April-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Rochester, NY

Posted 2010-November-15, 09:57

I would say that 3 in 2-2-2-2-3 shows a GF with at least 5 hearts, much like 2-2-2 shows a GF with 5+ spades. 2-2-3/3 shows an independent major suit and demands control-bids if responder has any.
--------------------
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
0

#17 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2010-November-18, 08:59

You are asking people to explain inferences in a system (BWS) that no-one actually plays.
I can tell you the difference in my methods, but I play a 2C opening as forcing to game (or 2NT).
0

#18 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2010-November-18, 09:08

It seems normal to me if the first sequence shows 6+ hearts but does not rule out other strains. The second sequence does rule out other strains. Both should be GF.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users