1st chair. What do you expect from partner in the following 6 auctions?
p-(p)-1d-(1h)
2c-(p)-p-(2h)
p-(p)-Y
where
Y = X?
Y = 2S?
Y = 2N?
p-(p)-1d-(1h)
2c-(2h)-Y
where
Y = X?
Y = 2S?
Y = 2N?
Page 1 of 1
6-in-1
#1
Posted 2010-November-06, 10:08
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#2
Posted 2010-November-06, 10:11
X= take out
2♠ = natural (reverse if bid directly)
2NT = natural or pick a minor if bid reopening
2♠ = natural (reverse if bid directly)
2NT = natural or pick a minor if bid reopening
#3
Posted 2010-November-06, 10:32
Double for me is penalty after the pass of 2C. 2S is competitive (effectively this replaces a take-out double). 2NT is competitive to 3 of a minor with better diamonds.
(-: Zel :-)
#4
Posted 2010-November-06, 10:35
I had a negX, did I not?
Did not select that.
X after pass: C:Hx want D:Hx to 3D.
X not passed: H-stuff -> try NT or penalties?
2S after pass: can we play S:4-3?
2S not passed: S-stops, do you stop hearts
2NT after pass: is one of the minors likely running?
2NT not passed: H-stops, can we 3NT?
Did not select that.
X after pass: C:Hx want D:Hx to 3D.
X not passed: H-stuff -> try NT or penalties?
2S after pass: can we play S:4-3?
2S not passed: S-stops, do you stop hearts
2NT after pass: is one of the minors likely running?
2NT not passed: H-stops, can we 3NT?
#5
Posted 2010-November-06, 13:36
This is not in a "Non-natural" or "SAYC 2/1" forum, so may we assume a natural system like Acol?
IMO, After...
_P (_P) 1♦ (1♥)
2♣ (_P) _P (2♥)
_P (_P) ??
_P (_P) 1♦ (1♥)
2♣ (2♥) ??
IMO, After...
_P (_P) 1♦ (1♥)
2♣ (_P) _P (2♥)
_P (_P) ??
- _X = ♥
- 2♠ = ♠
- 2N = ♦ with ♣ tolerance.
_P (_P) 1♦ (1♥)
2♣ (2♥) ??
- _X = T/O
- 2♠ = 5+ ♦ 4+ ♠ reversing values.
- 2N = Natural.
#6
Posted 2010-November-06, 13:47
2/1
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#7
Posted 2010-November-06, 20:18
In the first one, we've already limited ourselves to weak hands without exciting distribution, and common sense takes over:
I don't honestly know whether X should be takeout or just values/inviting partner to leave it in. 2S weak and natural, 2N pick a minor.
In the second one, most partnerships will have actual agreements. Mine are X=support, 2S=reverse-like values with spades, 2NT=the bad half of good/bad, immediate 3C or 3D= the good half of good/bad. Yes, there are risks assuming support doubles apply over minors the same as they do over majors if you haven't discussed it.
I am sure some people agree 2NT is natural NF in the 2nd auction -- I expect that to be common in flight B and C, but a minority treatment in A (quite possibly behind both good/bad and natural strong.)
I don't honestly know whether X should be takeout or just values/inviting partner to leave it in. 2S weak and natural, 2N pick a minor.
In the second one, most partnerships will have actual agreements. Mine are X=support, 2S=reverse-like values with spades, 2NT=the bad half of good/bad, immediate 3C or 3D= the good half of good/bad. Yes, there are risks assuming support doubles apply over minors the same as they do over majors if you haven't discussed it.
I am sure some people agree 2NT is natural NF in the 2nd auction -- I expect that to be common in flight B and C, but a minority treatment in A (quite possibly behind both good/bad and natural strong.)
#8
Posted 2010-November-08, 10:50
Let me be more specific:
What shape(s) are we expecting from opener (for X, 2S, 2N) in the case where opener is re-balancing?
What shape(s) are we expecting from opener (for X, 2S, 2N) in the case where opener is re-balancing?
"I think maybe so and so was caught cheating but maybe I don't have the names right". Sure, and I think maybe your mother .... Oh yeah, that was someone else maybe. -- kenberg
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
"...we live off being battle-scarred veterans who manage to hate our opponents slightly more than we hate each other.” -- Hamman, re: Wolff
#9
Posted 2010-November-09, 04:06
wyman, on 2010-November-08, 10:50, said:
What shape(s) are we expecting from opener (for X, 2S, 2N) in the case where opener is re-balancing?
3442, 4252, xx53 or maybe xx52
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Page 1 of 1

Help
