lebensohl question
#1
Posted 2010-November-01, 07:02
playing lebensohl, what would be a distinction between the following sequences:
1nt-2d-3s
and
1nt-2d-2nt-p
3c-p-3s
ie slow and fast 3 spades
i feel forlorn, i only have one partner who knows lebensohl, the others have a large number of misses
thanks
#2
Posted 2010-November-01, 07:11
#3
Posted 2010-November-01, 07:16
Alternatively play the first as showing a stopper and the second as denying one.
In either case, there are also those who swap the fast and the slow path.
So if you guess you have 25% chance of getting it right.
#4
Posted 2010-November-01, 07:39
helene_t, on 2010-November-01, 07:16, said:
Alternatively play the first as showing a stopper and the second as denying one.
In either case, there are also those who swap the fast and the slow path.
So if you guess you have 25% chance of getting it right.
Yes, many people use the principle of fast arrival to bid 3♠ directly with the one that can be passed and go thru 2N with the one that can't. You just have to disuss it, but some people will call this swapped version reverse lebensohl, so you have a slightly better than 50/50 shot to assume that the direct jump to 3♠ is the strong one.
#5
Posted 2010-November-01, 09:59
campboy, on 2010-November-01, 07:11, said:
This is what Ron Anderson ( in his book on Lebensohl ) recommends ... ie. does not guarantee any stop(s).
I think the reasoning is that you rely on the partner ( the 1NT opener ) to have Diam-stop(s).
However, let's say Responder doesn't have a long Major or even a 4 card Major, then over 2D interference, a direct 3NT denies a Diam stop whereas the slow 3NT shows Diam-stop(s).
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall
" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh
K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
#6
Posted 2010-November-01, 09:59
Cyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 07:39, said:
My experience is different, as I've never seen anyone playing the direct 3♠ as invitational. So I'd reckon it was more like a 99-1 shot.
#7
Posted 2010-November-01, 10:15
The rationale is similar to the rationale for bidding the direct 3NT without a stopper and the slow 3NT with a stopper - when you are weaker, it is more important to get your message across quickly, as the opponents are more likely to compete against you when you are weaker than when you are stronger. Furthermore, if you are stronger, you can probably afford to take another bid if they do compete.
Besides, it is also a matter of consistency. Why play slow arrival in some Lebensohl auctions and not in others?
#8
Posted 2010-November-01, 11:29
#9
Posted 2010-November-01, 11:49
paulg, on 2010-November-01, 09:59, said:
You've not played against me or any of the better pairs from my part of the world then, and we describe it as "modified reversed lebensohl" as of course clubs have to be shown the normal way round.
Even if you don't do this, which way round you play showing the stopper varies wildly (we show the stop thru 2N).
#10
Posted 2010-November-01, 12:04
Cyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 11:49, said:
A fair conclusion
Cyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 11:49, said:
This is on my list of ten things to discuss in the five minutes before the game at the club. Absolutely no consistency in what people prefer - even regular partnerships can hold differing views!

Help
