BBO Discussion Forums: lebensohl question - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

lebensohl question

#1 User is offline   babalu1997 

  • Duchess of Malaprop
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 721
  • Joined: 2006-March-09
  • Gender:Not Telling
  • Interests:i am not interested

Posted 2010-November-01, 07:02

good morning folks

playing lebensohl, what would be a distinction between the following sequences:

1nt-2d-3s

and

1nt-2d-2nt-p
3c-p-3s

ie slow and fast 3 spades

i feel forlorn, i only have one partner who knows lebensohl, the others have a large number of misses

thanks

View PostFree, on 2011-May-10, 03:57, said:

Babalu just wanted a shoulder to cry on, is that too much to ask for?
0

#2 User is offline   campboy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,347
  • Joined: 2009-July-21

Posted 2010-November-01, 07:11

I think it's standard to play that fast is forcing, slow is invitational.
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,394
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Odense, Denmark
  • Interests:History, languages

Posted 2010-November-01, 07:16

Yeah that is probably the most common agreement.

Alternatively play the first as showing a stopper and the second as denying one.

In either case, there are also those who swap the fast and the slow path.

So if you guess you have 25% chance of getting it right.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,923
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-November-01, 07:39

View Posthelene_t, on 2010-November-01, 07:16, said:

Yeah that is probably the most common agreement.

Alternatively play the first as showing a stopper and the second as denying one.

In either case, there are also those who swap the fast and the slow path.

So if you guess you have 25% chance of getting it right.

Yes, many people use the principle of fast arrival to bid 3 directly with the one that can be passed and go thru 2N with the one that can't. You just have to disuss it, but some people will call this swapped version reverse lebensohl, so you have a slightly better than 50/50 shot to assume that the direct jump to 3 is the strong one.
0

#5 User is offline   TWO4BRIDGE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,247
  • Joined: 2010-October-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Texas

Posted 2010-November-01, 09:59

View Postcampboy, on 2010-November-01, 07:11, said:

I think it's standard to play that fast is forcing,...... slow is invitational.

This is what Ron Anderson ( in his book on Lebensohl ) recommends ... ie. does not guarantee any stop(s).
I think the reasoning is that you rely on the partner ( the 1NT opener ) to have Diam-stop(s).

However, let's say Responder doesn't have a long Major or even a 4 card Major, then over 2D interference, a direct 3NT denies a Diam stop whereas the slow 3NT shows Diam-stop(s).
Don Stenmark
TWOferBRIDGE
"imo by far in bridge the least understood concept is how to bid over a jump-shift
( 1M-1NT!-3m-?? )." ....Justin Lall

" Did someone mention relays? " .... Zelandakh

K-Rex to Mikeh : " Sometimes you drive me nuts " .
0

#6 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,184
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2010-November-01, 09:59

View PostCyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 07:39, said:

Yes, many people use the principle of fast arrival to bid 3 directly with the one that can be passed and go thru 2N with the one that can't. You just have to disuss it, but some people will call this swapped version reverse lebensohl, so you have a slightly better than 50/50 shot to assume that the direct jump to 3 is the strong one.

My experience is different, as I've never seen anyone playing the direct 3 as invitational. So I'd reckon it was more like a 99-1 shot.
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

#7 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2010-November-01, 10:15

I play the direct 3 as invitational, and the slow 3 as forcing.

The rationale is similar to the rationale for bidding the direct 3NT without a stopper and the slow 3NT with a stopper - when you are weaker, it is more important to get your message across quickly, as the opponents are more likely to compete against you when you are weaker than when you are stronger. Furthermore, if you are stronger, you can probably afford to take another bid if they do compete.

Besides, it is also a matter of consistency. Why play slow arrival in some Lebensohl auctions and not in others?
0

#8 User is offline   wank 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,866
  • Joined: 2008-July-13

Posted 2010-November-01, 11:29

here (uk) it's standard to play it consistently but reversed to you art, i.e. a direct 3NT shows a stop and a direct 3S is forcing
0

#9 User is offline   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,923
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-November-01, 11:49

View Postpaulg, on 2010-November-01, 09:59, said:

My experience is different, as I've never seen anyone playing the direct 3 as invitational. So I'd reckon it was more like a 99-1 shot.

You've not played against me or any of the better pairs from my part of the world then, and we describe it as "modified reversed lebensohl" as of course clubs have to be shown the normal way round.

Even if you don't do this, which way round you play showing the stopper varies wildly (we show the stop thru 2N).
0

#10 User is offline   paulg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 5,184
  • Joined: 2003-April-26
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Scottish Borders

Posted 2010-November-01, 12:04

View PostCyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 11:49, said:

You've not played against me or any of the better pairs from my part of the world then ...

A fair conclusion :)

View PostCyberyeti, on 2010-November-01, 11:49, said:

Even if you don't do this, which way round you play showing the stopper varies wildly (we show the stop thru 2N).

This is on my list of ten things to discuss in the five minutes before the game at the club. Absolutely no consistency in what people prefer - even regular partnerships can hold differing views!
The Beer Card

I don't work for BBO and any advice is based on my BBO experience over the decades
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users