BBO Discussion Forums: Evergreen Sectional board21 - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Evergreen Sectional board21

#1 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,085
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-September-11, 01:07

We finished 2nd B/ 1st C overall tonight with 55% but as usual there were a number of boards we could have done better. Here's one, atb.

Scoring: MP

1♠ (P) 2♣ (2♥)
2♠ (P) 4♠ (P)
4N (P) 5♥ (P)
5♠
*2♣ gf

“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#2 User is offline   lmilne 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 348
  • Joined: 2009-October-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Sydney, Australia

Posted 2010-September-11, 01:45

80% south, 100% north :)

That's not a GF, for one thing.
And what does North think partner has, bidding 3S instead of 4? Presumably some hand with very little slam interest (or overbid before ;) ), opposite which 5 might be in trouble. No way is keycard the way to go.
0

#3 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-11, 02:26

This is a very important hand to discuss. If 4S shows a hand unsuitable for slam, then it would be good to agree NEVER to do this with 3 keycards. This makes sense right, a hand with 2 aces and the trump king, even though it can be quite minimal, is not unsuitable for slam at all.

With this agreement, north can safely pass, knowing the partnership missed at least 2 keycards.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#4 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2010-September-11, 12:35

hanp, on Sep 11 2010, 03:26 AM, said:

This is a very important hand to discuss. If 4S shows a hand unsuitable for slam, then it would be good to agree NEVER to do this with 3 keycards. This makes sense right, a hand with 2 aces and the trump king, even though it can be quite minimal, is not unsuitable for slam at all.

With this agreement, north can safely pass, knowing the partnership missed at least 2 keycards.

A great suggestion here by Han.

I blame both sides here but South gets more blame since it really seems a stretch to GF with this hand, especially if the pair opens lots of 10 and 11 pt hands.
0

#5 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,085
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-September-11, 19:27

So how should this auction go;

1♠:1N*
2♠:4♠?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#6 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-11, 19:31

jillybean, on Sep 11 2010, 07:27 PM, said:

So how should this auction go;

1♠:1N*
2♠:4♠?

looks like a very reasonable auction
OK
bed
0

#7 User is offline   bd71 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 491
  • Joined: 2009-September-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Suburban Philadelphia

Posted 2010-September-11, 19:43

jjbrr, on Sep 11 2010, 08:31 PM, said:

jillybean, on Sep 11 2010, 07:27 PM, said:

So how should this auction go;

1♠:1N*
2♠:4♠?

looks like a very reasonable auction

I'll take that auction in a team game. Perhaps a minor difference but at matchpoints, I agree with others who don't think S has game-forcing hand so would prefer to see...

1♠ 1N
2♠ 3♠
4♠
0

#8 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-12, 01:18

Am I missing something or has everyone suggested that rebidding 2S with the north hand after 1S-1N is ok? You have a prime 16 with a good 6 card suit...that is much too good for 2S.
0

#9 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-September-12, 02:26

JLOGIC, on Sep 12 2010, 02:18 AM, said:

Am I missing something or has everyone suggested that rebidding 2S with the north hand after 1S-1N is ok? You have a prime 16 with a good 6 card suit...that is much too good for 2S.

No, not everyone has suggested that.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#10 User is offline   manudude03 

  • - - A AKQJT9876543
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,625
  • Joined: 2007-October-02
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-September-12, 03:49

If you have the agreement that 4S denies controls in the other 2 suits (a common agreement), then it's pointless to move with the N hand.
Wayne Somerville
0

#11 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,085
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-September-12, 06:30

hanp, on Sep 12 2010, 01:26 AM, said:

JLOGIC, on Sep 12 2010, 02:18 AM, said:

Am I missing something or has everyone suggested that rebidding 2S with the north hand after 1S-1N is ok? You have a prime 16 with a good 6 card suit...that is much too good for 2S.

No, not everyone has suggested that.

So what is it?

1♠:1N
3♠?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
Bridge should be fun!
0

#12 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-September-12, 07:34

jillybean, on Sep 12 2010, 07:30 AM, said:

hanp, on Sep 12 2010, 01:26 AM, said:

JLOGIC, on Sep 12 2010, 02:18 AM, said:

Am I missing something or has everyone suggested that rebidding 2S with the north hand after 1S-1N is ok? You have a prime 16 with a good 6 card suit...that is much too good for 2S.

No, not everyone has suggested that.

So what is it?

1♠:1N
3♠?

IMO, yes this. On BBO for most posters 2♠ is strong invitational when they hold this hand and weak non forcing when they hold KT9xxx Kx Kxx Kx. Partner is supposed to know the difference and act appropriately. When partner's crystal ball is acting up that is his problem.
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#13 User is offline   bucky 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 2010-May-18

Posted 2010-September-15, 12:41

jjbrr, on Sep 11 2010, 08:31 PM, said:

jillybean, on Sep 11 2010, 07:27 PM, said:

So how should this auction go;

1♠:1N*
2♠:4♠?

looks like a very reasonable auction

North hand is too strong for just rebidding 2♠. With 6 good spades and 16 HCP, it is clear to rebid 3♠. Also, if west hand is going to bid 2♥ after our side started 1♠-2♣, then maybe after 1♠-1NT there will be an interference of 2♥ or 3♥. So a more realistic auction will be:

1♠ (P) 1NT (2♥)
3♠ (P) 4♠

Or south can even bid 4♣ instead of 4♠, showing spade support with great clubs.
 
 
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users