Followup to "What is it?"
#1
Posted 2010-August-23, 00:27
Please critique our auction.
Edit: Answering questions - 2C was GF.
http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer...H6|pc|DK|mc|13|
#2
Posted 2010-August-23, 00:30
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#3
Posted 2010-August-23, 00:47
The only other questionable decision IMO was whether to rebid 3N as E immediately after 2♣, which for me would show 15-17 with a stiff heart (reason for not opening 1N) & a club stopper.
#4
Posted 2010-August-23, 00:49
peachy, on Aug 23 2010, 01:27 AM, said:
Please critique our auction.
http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer...H6|pc|DK|mc|13|
Was 2C forcing to game? Forcing to 2NT? Could 2D have been passed?
Hard to answer without knowing the answers to above.
If 2C was game forcing, I think both players underbid. I'd rather raise 2NT to 4NT with the East hand and I would raise 3NT to 4NT with the West hand.
#5
Posted 2010-August-23, 00:50
#6
Posted 2010-August-23, 01:04
BudH, on Aug 23 2010, 01:49 AM, said:
peachy, on Aug 23 2010, 01:27 AM, said:
Please critique our auction.
http://www.bridgebase.com/tools/handviewer...H6|pc|DK|mc|13|
Was 2C forcing to game? Forcing to 2NT? Could 2D have been passed?
Hard to answer without knowing the answers to above.
If 2C was game forcing, I think both players underbid. I'd rather raise 2NT to 4NT with the East hand and I would raise 3NT to 4NT with the West hand.
I would never raise 2NT to 4NT with the East hand. It is premature to do that IMO. What evidence is there that I should be inviting slam at that point and refusing to describe my hand further? Partner's 2C was searching for 3-card heart support, a club stopper, a fifth diamond, or whatever the description opener might give to help responder decide the next move (in addition to 2C being GF). I liked jdonn suggestion to bid 3C instead of 3NT, but 4NT is truly awful IMO.
#7
Posted 2010-August-23, 01:06
CSGibson, on Aug 23 2010, 12:47 AM, said:
That works. Maybe Peachy didn't think of that.
His partner's 2C, rather than 3N kept the ball in the court for slam...with his bit of extra values; but over 3NT by East, I think the auction would be swift to 6N.
#8
Posted 2010-August-23, 01:11
aguahombre, on Aug 23 2010, 02:06 AM, said:
CSGibson, on Aug 23 2010, 12:47 AM, said:
That works. Maybe Peachy didn't think of that.
His partner's 2C, rather than 3N kept the ball in the court for slam...with his bit of extra values; but over 3NT by East, I think the auction would be swift to 6N.
I did think about it, with only a single club stopper that was not even positional, I promptly discarded that idea.
#9
Posted 2010-August-23, 01:17
#10
Posted 2010-August-23, 01:42
aguahombre, on Aug 23 2010, 02:17 AM, said:
Tell me what you mean about "spade stopper".
#11
Posted 2010-August-23, 02:20
jdonn, on Aug 23 2010, 08:50 AM, said:
Agree.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#12
Posted 2010-August-23, 03:32
#13
Posted 2010-August-23, 07:47
hanp, on Aug 23 2010, 09:32 AM, said:
why not 12-14(15) and 2NT stronger? looks better to me.
#14
Posted 2010-August-23, 08:29
1D - 1H
1S - 2C!
2D - ??
2NT = 12 -14 or 18,19 ( will next bid 4NT over 3NT w/ the stronger range )
3NT = 15-17
#15
Posted 2010-August-23, 08:40
East West
1D - 2C! ( GF, does not deny a 4 cd Major )
2D ( 5 cards, 1st priority and does not deny a 4 cd Major ) - 2H ( 4 cds )
2S ( 4 cds ) - ??
2NT = 12-14, or 18,19 ( will rebid 4NT over 3NT to show stronger range )
3NT = 15-17
#16
Posted 2010-August-23, 14:43
the main issue with FSF agreed as GF is, that peoble quite often
dont discuss how to transmit strength.
It does not really matter, if you play 2NT stronger than 3NT, as long
as you have discussed this.
Having said this, we are talking about a good 6NT contract, which is
on with 32 withou bid fits, but every point of is really needed, and there
is no wastage, so I would just say, next bord.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2010-August-23, 15:12
Fluffy, on Aug 23 2010, 08:47 AM, said:
hanp, on Aug 23 2010, 09:32 AM, said:
why not 12-14(15) and 2NT stronger? looks better to me.
WHAT! and leave extra room below game to explore for slam!! It's not like they were in a GF (NOT) and besides 2/1ers sneer at the fast arrival principle.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#18
Posted 2010-August-23, 15:38
But jumps in notrump, when an auction is still searching for strain, show extra strength.
#20
Posted 2010-August-24, 01:10
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher

Help
