Ok, maybe it's not that interesting And you must accept my conditions!
#1
Posted 2010-August-01, 13:28
1NT 15-17 on your right, you bid a natural 2♥. LHO bids 3♥ and partner passes. RHO looks nervous then blurts out "I think that's a transfer" and bids 3♠. You pass and LHO bids a stern 3NT. RHO hems and haws and reaches and pulls back and finally bids 4♠.
For some reasons which I stated and even better ones that I didn't, you are not going to call a director no matter what they do, how much UI they take advantage of, etc. However in that context you still want the best score possible on the hand.
Double 4♠, expecting LHO may run with her non-spades, or pass and take your money in 50s?
#2
Posted 2010-August-01, 13:42
In case 4♠ is not a normal contract we should get a top anyway and double may convince them to run away.
#4
Posted 2010-August-01, 14:01
Take the money. Doubling is an invite to hear a stern 4N.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#5
Posted 2010-August-01, 14:15
Phil, on Aug 1 2010, 03:01 PM, said:
Take the money. Doubling is an invite to hear a stern 4N.
But maybe your defense against that is pretty good too? Or maybe that is taken as blackwood? Just playing devil's advocate...
#6
Posted 2010-August-01, 14:35
#7
Posted 2010-August-01, 14:35
If it's matchpoints there's probably little upside in doubling and the downside is greater since people avoid 5 of a minor even when it's right, but I want them to be scared to bid against me next time so I would still double.
#8
Posted 2010-August-01, 14:40
jdonn, on Aug 1 2010, 03:15 PM, said:
Phil, on Aug 1 2010, 03:01 PM, said:
Take the money. Doubling is an invite to hear a stern 4N.
But maybe your defense against that is pretty good too? Or maybe that is taken as blackwood? Just playing devil's advocate...
Yes my defense is pretty good, especially against nervous club players!
I've played a lot of club bridge against awful opponents. Here, our table feel is that the opponents have suffered a misunderstanding. LHO (who I'm learning to dislike as I read this thread) is acting improperly. My RHO seems like he/she very well could be acting ethically and not taking advantage of the blatant UI.
I guess I have a soft spot for people like this. So I keep my original answer and pass 4♠. Even if I have to explain why I'm not trying my hardest and "getting the best score possible", I can tell my partner (client?) that I thought they were in a strange spot and didn't want to turn an 85% board defending 4♠, into a 40% score defending 4N when they run a slew of minor tricks against us.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#9
Posted 2010-August-01, 15:12
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#10
Posted 2010-August-01, 15:16
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#11
Posted 2010-August-01, 20:54
Outside of those two circumstances, however, I am going to just play 4 spades. I anticipate that it will be a good score anyway, and maximizing my score on every board is not necessarily worth adding to the feeling of ill will around the table.
Edit: I just saw that the goal was to maximize the score. In that case, wield your might axe, sir.
#12
Posted 2010-August-02, 02:49
#13
Posted 2010-August-02, 03:29
Normally I would pass, but I can't help doubling on this occasion. From the description, they clearly messed up.
#14
Posted 2010-August-02, 06:54
LHO seems to have already demonstrated ethical impairment, why should I think he is leaving 4♠ alone? He will bid 4NT either way.
But RHO is much more likely to interpret 4NT as to play, if I have doubled 4♠. I want to increase the chance that he takes it as blackwood, or anything other than simple rescue, so I pass.
And in the minority case that LHO is satisfied with 4♠, I certainly do not want to double. They might even make it.
-gwnn

Help
