BBO Discussion Forums: UNT??? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

UNT??? 2NT in balancing seat?

#1 User is offline   dae 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 21
  • Joined: 2005-May-26

Posted 2010-August-02, 22:54

1 S, 2 nt in direct seat~~~~~~ 2 nt shows 2 lower unbid suits.

1 S, P, P , 2 nt does this have the same meaning? One teacher on BBO says it is a real 2 NT hand with 19-21 points, since a balancing NT is 11=14, , a double and then NT is a normal 1 nt with15-17, so 2 NT must be more than that-18-21. Does anyone play it that way?
0

#2 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,681
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2010-August-02, 23:26

The standard meaning is that a balancing 2NT is natural and strong. The exact point range may be subject to some discussion, but the ranges you suggested are approximately right. This is certainly what I play in my partnerships.

The balancing cuebid is perhaps subject to a bit more debate. The old-fashioned "standard" meaning is a very strong takeout, but I think many people play it as a two-suiter now.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#3 User is offline   Ant590 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 749
  • Joined: 2005-July-17
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2010-August-03, 02:22

dae, on Aug 3 2010, 05:54 AM, said:

1 S, P, P , 2 nt a real 2 NT hand with 19-21 points, since a balancing NT is 11=14, , a double and then NT is a normal 1 nt with15-17, so 2 NT must be more than that-18-21. Does anyone play it that way?

Every reasonable or better player I know plays it as big balanced.

In fact when I want to quickly assess how bad a pair are in a club game I look to the balancing 2NT bid to see if how they play it.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users