BBO Discussion Forums: Western Cue Bids - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Western Cue Bids

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-July-17, 16:51

I know that a Western Cue Bid asks partner to bid NT (almost always 3NT) with a stopper in the opponents' suit, but it's not clear to me in which situations this is applicable. My understanding is that they apply when opponents have shown one suit, not two suits. Does it matter whether we have suit agreement (presumably in a minor)? If pard and I have agreed to play Western Cue Bids but not discussed when, should I expect this:
1-(1)-2-(P)
3-(P)-3
to be one? While we're in this auction, what would 3 have been instead of 3?

Thanks for your help.
0

#2 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-July-17, 17:20

3 on your auction would be, at least for now, asking for a spade stopper ---Giving it a name, like WQ is fine, I guess. If opener does bid 3NT and responder pulls, then 3S was a cue for slam.

3 on your other scenario is a four card heart suit, for now. Also might have been a cue for slam. You will find out later.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#3 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,882
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2010-July-17, 17:28

Yep
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
0

#4 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-July-17, 17:45

ya nonjumps to 3M of opps suit are pretty much always requesting a 3NT bid with a stopper. if partner bids again hes got the nuts.

jumps are shortness though!
OK
bed
0

#5 User is offline   zenko 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 166
  • Joined: 2006-April-26

Posted 2010-July-17, 18:56

I find to be most useful to use cue in these kind of sequences as semi-stoper ask (K, Qx, Jxx, 10xxx will do). The logic is that the pard, himself having a robust stoper will usually remember to bid NT anyway, there is no real need to prompt him to do so. Those "both pards each have iffy stoper that combined are good enough" are frequent and hard to handle without this agreement. Therefore in this situation 3H bid would primarily show values in H and no help in spades.
0

#6 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2010-July-17, 19:10

Zenko, in order for that to work, you need to back up and say that you would make a neg double with every hand which has 4 hearts, including those which have longer diamonds and game forcing values. I am not willing to do that.

But, it is true that on some auctions partner will know and show her stopper in their suit without needing to be reminded that she has one via a WQ ask. This just doesn't happen to be one of those cases, because of the danger that she will raise hearts. If 3H was a cue for slam, you won't care about the raise.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#7 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2010-July-17, 19:30

Bbradley62, on Jul 17 2010, 05:51 PM, said:

My understanding is that they apply when opponents have shown one suit, not two suits.
When you are interested in no-trump after opponents have shown two suits, in some auctions, you can try cueing the suit in which you have the better stopper, asking, in the first instance, for a stopper in the other.
0

#8 User is offline   Rossoneri 

  • Wabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2007-January-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Singapore

Posted 2010-July-18, 13:20

nige1, on Jul 18 2010, 02:30 AM, said:

Bbradley62, on Jul 17 2010, 05:51 PM, said:

My understanding is that they apply when opponents have shown one suit, not two suits.
When you are interested in no-trump after opponents have shown two suits, in some auctions, you can try cueing the suit in which you have the better stopper, asking, in the first instance, for a stopper in the other.

Couldn't you play it the other way round - cueing the suit you don't have a stopper in? Or is there some disadvantage to this?
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD

Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
0

#9 User is offline   peachy 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,056
  • Joined: 2007-November-19
  • Location:Pacific Time

Posted 2010-July-18, 13:29

Rossoneri, on Jul 18 2010, 02:20 PM, said:

nige1, on Jul 18 2010, 02:30 AM, said:

Bbradley62, on Jul 17 2010, 05:51 PM, said:

My understanding is that they apply when opponents have shown one suit, not two suits.
When you are interested in no-trump after opponents have shown two suits, in some auctions, you can try cueing the suit in which you have the better stopper, asking, in the first instance, for a stopper in the other.

Couldn't you play it the other way round - cueing the suit you don't have a stopper in? Or is there some disadvantage to this?

One disadvantage is that you need to agree that with partner because "everybody and their dog" plays it so that you bid the suit you have stopped unless there is only one enemy suit known.
0

#10 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-July-18, 14:54

peachy, on Jul 19 2010, 04:29 AM, said:

One disadvantage is that you need to agree that with partner because "everybody and their dog" plays it so that you bid the suit you have stopped unless there is only one enemy suit known.

At least when you life in some isolated places like the USA which are not so open for foreign ideas. :)

If you life in Poland you may know that anybody and his dog shows the suit where they need help in....
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users