BBO Discussion Forums: Landy then bid again? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Landy then bid again?

#1 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,155
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2010-July-14, 02:36

Scoring: MP

(1nt)(1) - 2 (2) - (2nt)(3) - p;
(3)(4) - p - (3)(5)-p;
(p)-?

(1) 12-14
(2) majors (5+/4+ either way)
(3) Lebensohl
(4) forced
(5) invitational with diamonds

Do you balance here or would that be bad, or totally insane?
0

#2 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2010-July-14, 02:52

It would be insane at imps.

At MPs you can try for something if you like gambling and have an understanding pard. That something should be double (3M would be a 64, so dbl is the only way to show a 55. With 54 you pass ofc).
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-July-14, 03:36

I didn't bid over 3, when responder's most likely hand was a signoff in my singleton. Now that I know he has an invitation in my doubleton, wouldn't it be a bit inconsistent to bid?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   JLOGIC 

  • 2011 Poster of The Year winner
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,002
  • Joined: 2010-July-08
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-July-14, 08:05

Eww no.

How likely do you think it is that you will play undoubled? You have announced that your hand is not very good by passing 3C. They have announced they have enough to try for game. Your partner has announced a hand without a great fit by passing throughout. And you're vul at MP.

This is just like offering yourself up on a platter, and I don't even see why you'd want to, your doubleton is diamonds and your suits are not very good.
0

#5 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-July-14, 09:25

It's insane. 5512 would just be very bad.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#6 User is offline   Stephen Tu 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,155
  • Joined: 2003-May-14

Posted 2010-July-14, 12:33

Partner has 4225 with ST DA CJ, 3 makes (easier to get to at other tables, strong NT so a Michaels auction promising 5-5). He thought with 5-5 rather than a 4-5 I should double back in. I thought he was nuts.
0

#7 User is offline   eyhung 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 345
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Location:San Jose, CA
  • Interests:bridge, poker, literature, boardgames, computers, classical music, baseball, history

Posted 2010-July-14, 12:58

I was in the same game and played in your seat, Stephen. Having played against your partner fairly frequently, I noticed your partner often bids Michaels with 4-5 in the majors. I think that would explain why he feels the way he does.

At our table I showed both majors over a 1C opener and my partner bid 3S over 3D, and I had no reason to go further.

EDIT: Never mind, I forgot that the OP was a Landy auction, so what I said doesn't really hold water.
Eugene Hung
0

#8 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-July-14, 13:00

Michaels is entirely different from Landy, which is very common with 5-4 (and sometimes with 4-4).
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#9 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-July-14, 13:30

Why is it the one who doesn't ever bid with 4 card support who always complains his partner didn't do enough?
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#10 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-July-14, 13:55

jdonn, on Jul 14 2010, 02:30 PM, said:

Why is it the one who doesn't ever bid with 4 card support who always complains his partner didn't do enough?

This might be standard policy in all countries, maybe Cascade can confirm this.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-July-14, 14:36

I wouldn't blame either partner for this. It's not particularly obvious for the other hand to bid 3 with 10xxx xx Ax Jxxxx. If that's a 4-4 fit, it's quite likely to get doubled for 200.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users