Opps silent.
Page 1 of 1
Hog it?
#2
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:53
I guess I bid 2C, thanks to the ace-and-spacey high cards and the spade shortness. But I have no complaint with anybody who passes it, and I wouldn't be surprised if that's the better action. Not vul pass would have more going for it.
#3
Posted 2010-July-07, 20:46
Little Kid, on Jul 7 2010, 05:36 PM, said:
Pass - 1♥
1NT - ?
1NT - ?
Opps silent.
while partner may have only none, 1, 2, or 3 ♣ he can also have 4,5, 6 or 7. he could also hold a 6 card red suit so bid on ....2♣ for me
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2010-July-08, 01:58
Seems like a playable contract, so pass.
2♣ is ok, but if pard goes back to hearts on xx♥, it might not be that hot.
2♣ is ok, but if pard goes back to hearts on xx♥, it might not be that hot.
#5
Posted 2010-July-08, 02:03
Both are fine, in MP I'd probably pass and hope to play it there.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
#6
Posted 2010-July-08, 03:42
They have a sure spade fit, so I am looking for my fit too and try 2 ♣
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#8
Posted 2010-July-08, 09:25
My experience is that 1NT is not a great contract in this auction even when opener has no viable alternative to passing. 2♣ here is a no brainer, it could even be 3-4 tricks better than 1NT.
#9
Posted 2010-July-08, 14:42
Apollo81, on Jul 9 2010, 04:25 AM, said:
My experience is that 1NT is not a great contract in this auction even when opener has no viable alternative to passing. 2♣ here is a no brainer, it could even be 3-4 tricks better than 1NT.
Agree. If partner is precisely 3253 we have a better spot less than half the time, otherwise we have a better spot much more than half the time.
#10
Posted 2010-July-08, 19:42
Put me down for 2♣ as well. Agree that in MPs it might be tempting to take my chances in 1N...
SCBA National TD, EBU Club TD
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.
#11
Posted 2010-July-09, 15:04
2♣, don't find it a problem at all. Partner usually has less than 4♠ and 0-2♥ so I fancy myself in a 2m contract which should play heaps better than 1NT.
- Andy -
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
Page 1 of 1

Help

1NT - ?