Do you agree with 1♠? What would you do if the auction proceeded like this?
I was so excited until...
#1
Posted 2010-July-07, 16:52
Do you agree with 1♠? What would you do if the auction proceeded like this?
#2
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:06
Maybe 4♣ or something should be a slam try for my suit. I never thought about it before but it doesn't make tons of sense for me to introduce a new minor on this auction.
#3
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:28
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#4
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:39
#5
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:47
jdonn, on Jul 8 2010, 11:06 AM, said:
Maybe 4♣ or something should be a slam try for my suit. I never thought about it before but it doesn't make tons of sense for me to introduce a new minor on this auction.
Aren't shapes like 7330, 7321, 6331, 6322 quite common for partner. If so we could easily belong in a 5=3 minor suit fit at the slam level.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#6
Posted 2010-July-07, 18:00
#8
Posted 2010-July-07, 19:16
George Carlin
#9
Posted 2010-July-07, 19:23
TimG, on Jul 7 2010, 07:48 PM, said:
Gerber obv
Thats my call; we might as well get to 7♠ is pard has three aces. I can't out what I need to know if pard is missing one, so I will settle for 6.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2010-July-07, 19:44
On this hand, not sure... 6♠ is ok, I guess.
#11
Posted 2010-July-07, 21:38
Phil, on Jul 7 2010, 08:23 PM, said:
TimG, on Jul 7 2010, 07:48 PM, said:
Gerber obv
Thats my call; we might as well get to 7♠ is pard has three aces. I can't out what I need to know if pard is missing one, so I will settle for 6.
lol serious post or sarcastic?
Oh you said 5♣ ok probably serious post!
#12
Posted 2010-July-07, 23:01
I still bid 5♣ in case you are wondering.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#13
Posted 2010-July-07, 23:34
1♦ : 1♠
3NT : 5♣(1)
5♠(2) : 5NT(3)
6♥(4) : 7♠(5)
(1) Exclusion RKCB in ♠
(2) 2 keys no ♠Q
(3) Asking for ♦K (doesn't ask for ♣K due to known void)
(4) ♦K & ♥K
(5) I hope this ♠ suit will play for no losers!
I ♦ bidding the suit below the suit I'm actually showing not to be described as a "transfer" for the benefit of people unfamiliar with the concept of a transfer
#14
Posted 2010-July-08, 02:06

Help

1♦ - 1♠
3NT* - ?
* 3NT: Good 6-7 card suit, semi-bal hand with unbid suits usually stopped. You respond very light to openers and his strength is anywhere from a minimum GF to just under a 2♣ bid. Normally 6222, 6331, 7321 and 7222 shapes.