What to do here? Maybe you pushed a little...
#1
Posted 2010-July-07, 16:51
♠J
♥J9xx
♦AQTxx
♣9xx
1NT-3♠-X-Pa
4♣-Pa-???
How do you rate the double?
What would you do now?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2010-July-07, 17:59
Partner isn't willing to play 3N with his spades and doesn't have 4H... I am leaving it at 4C and hoping we make it. At least in clubs we are ruffing spades in the correct hand, which we won't be in diamonds.
#3
Posted 2010-July-08, 02:00
#6
Posted 2010-July-08, 06:31
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2010-July-08, 08:01
Hanoi5, on Jul 7 2010, 05:51 PM, said:
♠J
♥J9xx
♦AQTxx
♣9xx
1NT-3♠-X-Pa
4♣-Pa-???
How do you rate the double?
What would you do now?
How is partner interpreting your double? Not that I have a problem with either interpretation but need to now to decide how to proceed over 4♣
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#8
Posted 2010-July-08, 08:34
Double suggests S-stop or will show unilateral hand next.
Which (X, 3N, new suit) shows 4xH, which denies 4xH?
I think 4D immediate denies S-stop, suggests 4xH unless unilateral shown next.
#9
Posted 2010-July-08, 09:19
Double announces ownership of the hand, imo, and we aren't quite strong enough.
We wouldn't be sure that we'd like to see 3N from partner...he rates to hold only one spade stopper and even if diamonds run, rho may have an entry. And if he has 4 hearts, there is a higher than normal chance of bad breaks.
I'd just have passed and hoped to go +100 or so.
As it is, I predictably now face a guess, and guessing wrong will convert what was likely a small plus into a small minus....altho when all are red, the imp swing may be significant.
I guess to bid 4♦.
#10
Posted 2010-July-08, 09:27
#11
Posted 2010-July-08, 09:57
jdonn, on Jul 8 2010, 10:27 AM, said:
10x KQx Kxxx AKxx, would you pass, bid 3N or....4♣?
Edit: bad example: I'd bid 4♥ and I suspect you would as well. Goes to show that making up hands to make a point can backfire.
I'm not sure why I'm arguing with you over this, since neither you nor I would be in this situation, as the only 2 passers of 3♠ so far.
#12
Posted 2010-July-08, 10:04
mikeh, on Jul 8 2010, 10:57 AM, said:
jdonn, on Jul 8 2010, 10:27 AM, said:
10x KQx Kxxx AKxx, would you pass, bid 3N or....4♣?
Edit: bad example: I'd bid 4♥ and I suspect you would as well. Goes to show that making up hands to make a point can backfire.
I'm not sure why I'm arguing with you over this, since neither you nor I would be in this situation, as the only 2 passers of 3♠ so far.
Actually sorry I had a typo I meant to say the double is clear and the pass next round is beyond clear. So keep arguing with me!
#13
Posted 2010-July-08, 10:57
mikeh, on Jul 8 2010, 10:57 AM, said:
At MPs I think I would pass with this. Maybe at IMPs too; partner should not be prone to forcing us to the 4 level on marginal values to compete with the part score.
Agree with Josh, passing 4♣ is clear. Frankly bidding is a LOL.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#14
Posted 2010-July-08, 11:32
Pass now. I am a slight bit worried about 4H making but still Pass.

Help
