BBO Discussion Forums: low level competition - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

low level competition

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2010-June-22, 19:06

http://tinyurl.com/38yyhf7

Souths split on whether to rebid 1♠ or double. (Well, those who hadn't opened 1NT anyway...) GIB interprets both as 11-21HCP and 12-22 total points, with these distributions:
double: 3+C; 4-7D; 2-H; 3+S
1♠: 3+D; 4+S

Following double, NorthGIB bids 2♦ showing 3+D; 11- total points. Following 1♠, NorthGIB bids 2♣ showing 4+C; 3-S; 11- HCP; 8-12 total points. NorthGIB has neither the shape nor the strength described.
0

#2 User is offline   arigreen 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 129
  • Joined: 2006-March-05
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-July-02, 14:02

X from south looks normal to me, over which 2♦ by GIB is fine.

GIB's 2♣ rebid over 1♠ might have been okay if 3 of its pointed cards were clubs. What was GIB thinking?

After P-P-P-1♦-1♥-P-P-1♠-P GIB simulated among P, 2♣, 2♦, 2♠.

2♣ was the winning bid because it often elicited 3N from partner while 2♦ would have ended the auction.

GIB thinks that 2♣ shows 8-12 total points, hence allowing partner to bid 3N.

A solution here would be to redefine 2♣ as showing a long suit with 0-8 total points
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users