2010 US Open Trials glen-style system breakdown
#1
Posted 2010-June-16, 06:25
Friday begins the US Open Team Trials for USA Open team 1 for the 2011 BBowl.
http://usbf.org/index.php?option=com_conte...d=31&Itemid=284
What systems are top US players playing today?
2/1 or standard, no transfer responses or weak NT: 36
Meckwell precision openings, mostly with meck lite responses: 16
2/1 or standard, transfer responses to 1C, strong NT: 7
2/1 or standard, weak (12-14 or less) NT: 3
other: 2
Preempt styles ignored (rarely matter, nor can they be played in most events in the US).
Thanks,
Dan
#2
Posted 2010-June-16, 06:32
Interesting to see that 7 pairs are playing transfer responses to 1C. Among those 46 "2/1 or standard" pairs, I would like to see how many:
- Play that 2/1 is 100% GF, almost GF, or not GF.
- Play that 1C can be a doubleton.
I may have time to look it up myself later.
#3
Posted 2010-June-16, 07:24
#4
Posted 2010-June-16, 07:30
George Carlin
#5
Posted 2010-June-16, 09:39
Free, on Jun 16 2010, 08:24 AM, said:
Inverted Polish Club
Canape Strong Club
#6
Posted 2010-June-16, 09:42
gwnn, on Jun 16 2010, 08:30 AM, said:
More than none, i.e. way too many
#7
Posted 2010-June-16, 10:03
zenko, on Jun 16 2010, 09:42 AM, said:
gwnn, on Jun 16 2010, 08:30 AM, said:
More than none, i.e. way too many
hamman plays flannery...
bed
#8
Posted 2010-June-16, 10:32
jjbrr, on Jun 16 2010, 11:03 AM, said:
zenko, on Jun 16 2010, 09:42 AM, said:
gwnn, on Jun 16 2010, 08:30 AM, said:
More than none, i.e. way too many
hamman plays flannery...
Well, following the logic ...he must be an idiot who doesn't know squat about bridge The thing most see about Flannery is just the bid itself not its fit into an overall system where it may (or may not) solve several other bidding problems by the failure to use the bid.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#9
Posted 2010-June-16, 11:14
DJNeill, on Jun 16 2010, 11:39 AM, said:
Free, on Jun 16 2010, 08:24 AM, said:
Inverted Polish Club
Canape Strong Club
Thanks to Dan for pointing me to the "Inverted Polish" club system - the system summary:
iPolish system summary
#10
Posted 2010-June-16, 11:20
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2010-June-16, 15:04
#12
Posted 2010-June-16, 16:40
jjbrr, on Jun 16 2010, 04:03 PM, said:
TERMINATE
#13
Posted 2010-June-16, 20:23
zenko, on Jun 16 2010, 10:42 AM, said:
gwnn, on Jun 16 2010, 08:30 AM, said:
More than none, i.e. way too many
What is wrong with Flannery? (I have not used it)
#15
Posted 2010-June-17, 02:57
#16
Posted 2010-June-17, 07:23
glen, on Jun 16 2010, 07:14 PM, said:
DJNeill, on Jun 16 2010, 11:39 AM, said:
Free, on Jun 16 2010, 08:24 AM, said:
Inverted Polish Club
Canape Strong Club
Thanks to Dan for pointing me to the "Inverted Polish" club system - the system summary:
iPolish system summary
i can see this is the name used by players but i don't understand what exactly is "inverted". maybe f@#$ed up polish club ;-)
#17
Posted 2010-June-17, 08:31
hanp, on Jun 17 2010, 02:57 AM, said:
Also Robinson-Boyd, and they won the previous trials.
bed
#18
Posted 2010-June-17, 08:33
On the subject of top players playing poor methods, I don't think there's anything surprising about it. Most people play methods that they're comfortable and familiar with; and most world-class players will still get world-class results regardless of their methods.
Look at the French, for example. Nobody outside France thinks that Standard French is any good, but their top players don't seem to have any difficulty with getting good results playing it.
#19
Posted 2010-June-17, 10:11
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#20
Posted 2010-June-17, 12:27