[OleBerg]

blackshoe, on Jun 1 2010, 04:04 AM, said:

Winstonm, on May 31 2010, 08:26 PM, said:

blackshoe, on May 31 2010, 07:18 PM, said:

The problem with the steady state theory is that it doesn't work.

So I've heard. I also understand the BB has holes, as well.

Holes, yes, but not to the extent that it doesn't work.

Lots of theories have holes. When we plug the holes, we get a new theory. Someday, maybe, we'll come up with a theory with no holes. But I'm not holding my breath for it.

No we will not. Gödels Theorem.

[gwnn]

but what if gödels theorem also has a little hole?

[OleBerg]

Anyway, the universe was created by The Flying Spaghetti Monster. Common knowledge.

[OleBerg]

gwnn, on Jun 6 2010, 12:14 AM, said:

but what if gödels theorem also has a little hole?

Then "Descartes Evil Demon" will do the job.

Enough silly buzz-words from. Off to bed.

[kfay]

Deja vu

QED

[OleBerg]

kfay, on Jun 6 2010, 12:33 AM, said:

Deja vu

QED

Using that argument again?

[PassedOut]

In case anyone still had doubts, here is the final word: Stephen Hawking on Religion: 'Science Will Win'.

Quote

But exploring the origins of time inevitably leads to questions about the ultimate origins of everything and what, if anything, is behind it all.

"What could define God [is thinking of God] as the embodiment of the laws of nature. However, this is not what most people would think of that God," Hawking told Sawyer. "They made a human-like being with whom one can have a personal relationship. When you look at the vast size of the universe and how insignificant an accidental human life is in it, that seems most impossible."

When Sawyer asked if there was a way to reconcile religion and science, Hawking said, "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works."

Amen.

[OleBerg]

PassedOut, on Jun 8 2010, 03:02 PM, said:

In case anyone still had doubts, here is the final word: Stephen Hawking on Religion: 'Science Will Win'.

Quote

But exploring the origins of time inevitably leads to questions about the ultimate origins of everything and what, if anything, is behind it all.

"What could define God [is thinking of God] as the embodiment of the laws of nature. However, this is not what most people would think of that God," Hawking told Sawyer. "They made a human-like being with whom one can have a personal relationship. When you look at the vast size of the universe and how insignificant an accidental human life is in it, that seems most impossible."

When Sawyer asked if there was a way to reconcile religion and science, Hawking said, "There is a fundamental difference between religion, which is based on authority, [and] science, which is based on observation and reason. Science will win because it works."

Amen.

Obviously all this "Evidence" is planted by the "Flying Spaghetti Monster", to test our faith.

Being benevolent in nature, it has of course left enough evidence for us to scientifically research the truth.

One example is the reverse propertionality betweem global warming and the number of pirates in the world.

Statistics never lie.