BBO Discussion Forums: Lebensohl and Transfer Lebensohl - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Lebensohl and Transfer Lebensohl Where and how?

#1 User is offline   Bende 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 149
  • Joined: 2007-January-23
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-May-27, 03:36

The situation
  • I play a system where 1 = balanced (11-13 or 17-19) or natural.
  • I want to find an effective system to deal with interference.
  • There are many possibilities but Transfer Lebensohl seems like a good option.
  • Although I rate effectiveness higher, it is good for memory to play similar constructs in different parts of the system.
  • Now I want comments from the forum if you think this is a reasonable attempt and if you can suggest some improvements.
Transfer Lebensohl
I have indicated with a question mark where I am not quite sure what makes sense.

1 - (2) -
dbl = Takeout
2 = Weak
2NT = Any strength with clubs or weak with lower ranking suit
---3 = Most common but opener can bid something else with good support for clubs
------pass = Weak with clubs
------3 = Weak with diamonds
------3 = Clubs and asking for stopper? GF with 31(45)?
------3 = 5+-4
------3NT = Clubs and suggestion to play? Slamish?
3 = Inv+ with 5+
---3 = Min
------3 = Asking for a stopper?
------3 = 5+-4
------3NT = Diamonds and suggestion to play? Slamish?
3 = 1. Asking for stopper and 2. Stayman
---3 = No stopper
------3 = 4
---3 = Stopper and 4
3 = Inv+ with 5+
3 = GF with 5 without a stopper

Approximately the same after interference with other bids at the two level:

1 - (2) -
2NT = 1. Asking for stopper and 2. Stayman

1 - (2) -
3 = 1. Asking for stopper and 2. Stayman

1 - (2) -
3 = Weak or GF with 5 ?
3 = Inv with 5
3 = GF with 4 without a stopper

I have also seen variants of Transfer Lebensohl where instead of one bid for stopper ask and Stayman, asker either shows or denies a stopper by either transferring to their suit or bidding 2NT followed by their suit. Is that a better construct?

Lebensohlish bids in other situations
First I thought it would make sense to use Transfer Lebensohl in many different situations to make it easier to remember but I had trouble getting that to work. Instead, how about this?

1/1NT - (2x = natural) - Transfer Lebensohl
1/1NT - (2x = artificial) - Transfer Lebensohl
1/ - (2M) - Transfer Lebensohl

(1x) - dbl - (2x) - Lebensohl (Transfer Lebensohl?)
(2x) - dbl - (pass) - Lebensohl
(2x) - dbl - (2y) - Lebenoshl (but dbl = penalty)
(2-multi) - dbl = 13-15NT - (2M) - Lebensohl (dbl = takeout)
(2x = artificial) - dbl - (pass = shows x) - Lebensohl
(2x = artificial) - dbl - (pass = relay) - Lebensohl

(1x) - pass - (2x) - dbl; (pass) - Scramblesohl
(2x) - pass - (pass) - dbl; (pass) - Scramblesohl

(Scramblesohl = After opponents bid spades, 2NT can be scrambling with minors, with red suits or weak with hearts, whereas 3 directly is constructive.)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users