BBO Discussion Forums: Can you bid this grand? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Can you bid this grand?

#1 User is offline   mohitz 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 357
  • Joined: 2008-May-19
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:India

  Posted 2010-May-25, 12:22

Scoring: MP


No, i did NOT construct this hand! Hand from the club today.

Looking for a reasonable sequence to 7H playing standard(ish) methods.
All your ace are belong to us!
0

#2 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2010-May-25, 12:52

Using Controls after 2♣ bid, it's easy.
2♣ - 2♠*
3♥ - 4♥
4NT** - 5♣
5♦ - 6♣***
7♥

* 3 Controls, has to be A♣ and either K♣ or K♦
** RKC 1430, doing it to look for Q♥
*** Technically we don't have Q♥, but with 5 trump opposite 5+ from partner, you have an 89% chance to not lose a trump trick with 10, and 100% with 11+. Therefore, I show my K♣, and partner duly bids the grand.

EDIT- If you say No, then tell us YOUR way gwnn. I agree with mike777's 2nd way, that would be the way I would like to play it. However, in WV the above bidding sequence would in fact be standard, with it being the same after 4♠ if playing Kickback, just a step down.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#3 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-May-25, 12:54

No.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#4 User is online   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 18,381
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:05

I can find out pard has 5hearts, AD and KC and denies KD or QC so:


1h=4d(Bergen style....5h with 1-1.5 outside quick tricks)
4s(rkc)=5c(1-4)
5s(specific K ask, grand try)=6c(kc)


Since I wont splinter....pard could be xx....xxxxx....Ax...Kxxx
----------------


option 2 would be to open 2c....but many will never do that holding this hand.



2c=2d(random pos.)
2h=3s(splinter)
4s( rkc)=etc...to 7h now

hope pard is not....x....Qxxx....Axx...Kxxxx
0

#5 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:28

chasetb, on May 25 2010, 11:52 AM, said:

Using Controls after 2♣ bid, it's easy.
2♣ - 2♠*
3♥ - 4♥
4NT** - 5♣
5♦ - 6♣***
7♥

* 3 Controls, has to be A♣ and either K♣ or K♦
** RKC 1430, doing it to look for Q♥
*** Technically we don't have Q♥, but with 5 trump opposite 5+ from partner, you have an 89% chance to not lose a trump trick with 10, and 100% with 11+. Therefore, I show my K♣, and partner duly bids the grand.

And partner won't play you to have:

♠xx
♥Qxxx
♦Axx
♣Kxxx
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#6 User is offline   chasetb 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 879
  • Joined: 2009-December-20
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Podunk, backwater USA

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:35

Echognome, on May 25 2010, 02:28 PM, said:

And partner won't play you to have:

♠xx
♥Qxxx
♦Axx
♣Kxxx

Considering I might be the only person within a 30 mile radius that can play a Precision Club and think about distributions, then that point is moot. My partner would be so infatuated with every keycard (s)he would bid 7♥. And sadly, I am serious. Like I posted in my edit right before you posted, that would be with all the people I play with at the club. Mike777's second option would be my ideal way, and the way it should be bid IMO. If partner has a 2nd negative, then (s)he would bid 2NT after 2♥, 2♠ shows 5(4)+ ♠ and no ♥ support.
"It's not enough to win the tricks that belong to you. Try also for some that belong to the opponents."

"Learn from the mistakes of others. You won't live long enough to make them all yourself."

"One advantage of bad bidding is that you get practice at playing atrocious contracts."

-Alfred Sheinwold
0

#7 User is offline   Echognome 

  • Deipnosophist
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,386
  • Joined: 2005-March-22

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:42

I could get there playing relay, but I will refrain from posting the details. I would likely open 1♥ rather than 2♣, figuring I can reverse to force from there if I get past this round. Over that I like a 3♠ splinter from North given the extra trump. We have a shot from there. Tough knowing both hands.
"Half the people you know are below average." - Steven Wright
0

#8 User is offline   Cascade 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Yellows
  • Posts: 6,772
  • Joined: 2003-July-22
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Zealand
  • Interests:Juggling, Unicycling

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:44

I can bid it playing standardish relay.

However if I manage to bid this one then I will also bid this one

Scoring: MP


and likely this one

Scoring: MP


which will both fail.

Our auction will be:

1♥

2NT spade splinter

3♦ diamond shortage

4♣ Cue

4♠ RKCB

5♣ One or Four

5♦ Heart queen?

6♥ Yes (or extra length)*

?


* We would have had the option to show something extra - specifically a king or just general extras since there is one free step
Wayne Burrows

I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon

#9 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,740
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2010-May-25, 13:53

I would not open a strong 2♣ on the south hand; the values are marginal and this is a hard pattern to describe if you don't have an immediate heart raise. Instead how about:

1♥ - 3♠(1)
3NT(2) - 4♣(3)
4♠(4) - 4N(5)
5♠(6) - 6♣(7)
7♥

(1) Better than normal preemptive 4♥ raise
(2) Ask for shortness; slam interest
(3) Spade shortness
(4) 1430 keycard
(5) One keycard
(6) King ask; we don't care about heart queen with ten trumps
(7) Club king

At this point south knows partner's exact hand except for minor suit shape and queens/jacks. While it is possible that north will hold exactly 1-5-2-5 distribution, this is very much against the odds (especially given south's minor suit lengths). Even if north has this lousy shape, there is some chance partner holds the spade jack (cold grand) or the club queen (cold grand) or the club jack (grand on a finesse) or that the jack-ten of spades are falling or that partner has a high enough diamond to allow a minor suit squeeze.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#10 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-May-25, 14:13

1♥ and splinter with N seem normal to me. If partner shows 1KC, then the ♥Q and ♣K, I would probably have to take other things into consideration before I decide what to bid.
OK
bed
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-May-25, 15:00

awm, on May 25 2010, 08:53 PM, said:

At this point south knows partner's exact hand except for minor suit shape and queens/jacks. While it is possible that north will hold exactly 1-5-2-5 distribution, this is very much against the odds (especially given south's minor suit lengths). Even if north has this lousy shape, there is some chance partner holds the spade jack (cold grand) or the club queen (cold grand) or the club jack (grand on a finesse) or that the jack-ten of spades are falling or that partner has a high enough diamond to allow a minor suit squeeze.

Even opposite A2 of diamonds you have a chance of a black-suit squeeze: just ruff the diamond in hand and run trumps.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   ONEferBRID 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 835
  • Joined: 2009-May-03

Posted 2010-May-25, 20:22

I , like the others, can find the missing key card and the "hQ" ( not knowing it is extra length ) and the cK but not the dK; and I will go down in 7 if the hands are like Cascade's ( a grand-killer 5 card Cl suit: K x x x x ).
Don Stenmark ( TWOferBRIDGE )
0

#13 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2010-May-26, 02:10

1♥-4♥-4♠-5♦-5♠-6♣-7♥
This is how a competant pair playing 2/1 bid, at our club when I presented this problem but they may have 'smelt' the grand.
Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#14 User is offline   jjbrr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,525
  • Joined: 2009-March-30
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2010-May-26, 08:33

zasanya, on May 26 2010, 02:10 AM, said:

1♥-4♥-4♠-5♦-5♠-6♣-7♥
This is how a competant pair playing 2/1 bid, at our club when I presented this problem but they may have 'smelt' the grand.

4♥ is hopeless
OK
bed
0

#15 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2010-May-26, 18:23

2♦(strong, forcing, artificial, 4+ spades)-P-2♥(not four spades)-P-
3♥(4♠, 5+♥)-p-4♠(splinter)-P-
4NT-P-5♣(1430 -- one)-P-
5♦(Queen?)-P-6♣(yes because of the fifth trump, this King)-P-

At this point, Opener expects Responder to have:

1. stiff spade (can ruff the fourth spade out)
2. Qxxx or xxxxx+ in hearts
3. Ace of Diamonds (no diamoond losers)
4. Club King

Thus, from Opener's perspective, the death hand is whenever Responder has five, or maybe six, clubs with no club Queen, or at least no Jack.

Opener could bid 6♦ as Grand slam Last Train, but this sure doesn't say "bid the grand with four or fewer clubs."

On the flip side, when Responder has the fifth heart, he might accept the grand slam last train, and the spade 9 might well be big enough to give one more option when Responder has the death holding -- some sort of squeeze.

So, the answer is no. I cannot get there. What I can do is get to a point where Opener and Responder might bid intelligently together and land in the grand slam if they each sense a need for a swing. This would be a very reasonable swing-seeking decision, as opposed to a blind, gambling one.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#16 User is offline   zasanya 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 747
  • Joined: 2003-December-24
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Thane,Mumbai,Maharashtra,India
  • Interests:Chess,Scrabble,Bridge

Posted 2010-May-27, 05:49

jjbrr, on May 26 2010, 09:33 AM, said:

zasanya, on May 26 2010, 02:10 AM, said:

1♥-4♥-4♠-5♦-5♠-6♣-7♥
This is how a competant pair playing 2/1 bid, at our club when I presented this problem but they may have 'smelt' the grand.

4♥ is hopeless

Why?
Aniruddha
Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
"Mediocrity knows nothing higher than itself, but talent instantly recognizes genius".
0

#17 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,497
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2010-May-27, 06:58

Agree with awm's sequence and reasons for bidding 7.

For me, 1H 4H shows a weakish distributional hand with 5 hearts, not a control rich distributional hand with 5 hearts.
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

#18 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-May-27, 08:02

zasanya, on May 27 2010, 12:49 PM, said:

jjbrr, on May 26 2010, 09:33 AM, said:

zasanya, on May 26 2010, 02:10 AM, said:

1♥-4♥-4♠-5♦-5♠-6♣-7♥
This is how a competant pair playing 2/1 bid, at our club when I presented this problem but they may have 'smelt' the grand.

4♥ is hopeless

Why?

The rest of the auction isn't much to write home about, either (unless there is some secret meaning that you haven't shared with us). If the challenge were how to find out that North had ♦A and ♣K, would it belong in this forum?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#19 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-May-27, 08:17

I can't...

One way that would work with DD vision (reasonable standard start):
1♥ - 3♣ (5+♥ ; 6-9, 4+♥)
4♦ - 4♠ (GF with singleton ♦ ; Kickback RKC)
4NT - 5♦? (1/4 ; K ask)
5♠ - 5NT (♠K ; asking for a 3rd round control ♠)
7♥ - pass
But why would you ask for Kings anyway? Partner can't have ♣K, and probably won't have ♦K. And ♠K doesn't help much. Even with the above auction you'd still be in grand if opener has AK-AKxxxx-x-Axxx.

More reasonable would be the following auction:
1♥ - 3♣ (5+♥ ; 6-9, 4+♥)
4♦ - 4♠ (SI with singleton ♦ ; Kickback RKC)
4NT - 6♣ (1/4 ; asking for 3rd round control ♣)
6♥ - pass
Now you'll reach grand if partner has Axxx-AKxxx-x-AQx or Axxx-AKxxxx-x-Ax (or better), which is way more probably than asking for ♠AKQ.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#20 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-May-27, 09:17

Erm, 6-9 with 4+ hearts?
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users