What do you guys think of 5♣ bid with actual hand ?
I know values are slim but probably defense will be very cheap.
Greed
#22
Posted 2010-May-14, 07:26
While a double on a pure penalty double is old-fashioned, it is still played by many good players (whether the Forum posters know them or not). But even among those who do not double with a pure penalty double, MikeH is correct - the double shows values which are valuable on both offense and defense.
The hand that doubled in this problem does not have defensive values - it is purely an offensive hand. At best it has very questionable defensive values. Perhaps the partnership was playing negative doubles through 4♥ or even higher. But everyone has to appreciate that the higher you get, the less likely the double will be taken out.
North has a serious problem over 4♥, and, unless he is 100% sure that partner is going to take out the double, the double is likely to produce a poor result. I would pass, and I would take out partner's reopening double to 4♠. But I am not happy about it.
The hand that doubled in this problem does not have defensive values - it is purely an offensive hand. At best it has very questionable defensive values. Perhaps the partnership was playing negative doubles through 4♥ or even higher. But everyone has to appreciate that the higher you get, the less likely the double will be taken out.
North has a serious problem over 4♥, and, unless he is 100% sure that partner is going to take out the double, the double is likely to produce a poor result. I would pass, and I would take out partner's reopening double to 4♠. But I am not happy about it.
#23
Posted 2010-May-15, 08:12
Why do people discuss double being a pure penalty double? If that's what it is we have the happiest pass ever so we might as well consider that it has the meaning that makes the problem interesting.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.

Help
