BBO Discussion Forums: Your call? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Your call?

#1 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 254
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-May-03, 11:45

Scoring: MP

Partner, in first chair, opens 1♠.

RHO bids 3♥; LHO waffles a bit and says he thinks it is pre-emptive. (He happens to be right in this case)

Your agreement is that negative doubles apply thru 3♦.

Now what?
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-May-03, 11:51

i guess 3NT?

please change the agreement next board ;)
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 254
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-May-03, 12:21

gwnn, on May 3 2010, 12:51 PM, said:

please change the agreement next board ;)

I agree.

In fact, I forgot we were playing negative doubles thru 3♦ and made one anyway.
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

#4 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2010-May-03, 12:47

gwnn, on May 3 2010, 12:51 PM, said:

i guess 3NT?

please change the agreement next board :)

Agreed on both counts. I'd love to make a negX but since I can't, lets hope we can take 9 tricks in 3NT prior to losing 5 tricks.
0

#5 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 254
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-May-03, 14:31

So 3NT was the winning call.

As opener, after the auction 1♠-(3♥)-X-(P)-

(let's say you're playing the double as negative)

what would you rebid with
♠KQTxxx
♥AJx
♦JTx
♣x
?

Do you trust partner to have the minors stopped and bid 3NT?

My partner bid 4♠, not unreasonably, and went down as the spades are 6-0. 5♦ is also down one; trumps are 3-2 but the defenders get ♠A, a club and a long club or spade at the end.

Clubs are blocked so the defenders can only take 3 clubs and the ♠A against 3NT.
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

#6 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-May-03, 16:22

Your partner should bid 3S, he has a minimum hand. He would happily pass your 3N bid over that.
0

#7 User is offline   Coelacanth 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 254
  • Joined: 2009-July-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Minnesota, USA

Posted 2010-May-04, 07:32

Jlall, on May 3 2010, 05:22 PM, said:

Your partner should bid 3S, he has a minimum hand. He would happily pass your 3N bid over that.

Well, right, but he thought I was making a penalty double of 3♥, which obviously should be a better hand than a negative double.
Brian Weikle
I say what it occurs to me to say when I think I hear people say things; more, I cannot say.
0

#8 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-May-04, 07:41

What heart holding would he consider to be good enough to sit your penalty double of 3♥?
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#9 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-May-04, 07:55

x good enough
AJx too strong

reminds me of this cthtonic story about heart stoppers too strong and weak enough
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#10 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-May-04, 09:19

655321, on May 4 2010, 08:41 AM, said:

What heart holding would he consider to be good enough to sit your penalty double of 3♥?

lol
0

#11 User is offline   mcphee 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,514
  • Joined: 2003-February-16

Posted 2010-May-05, 06:13

3N is all you can do here under the conditions. The good thing about this is you now fully appreciate why you need to change the dble agreements, and your partner may also. You could easily play the wrong game or miss a slam.
0

#12 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2010-May-05, 06:39

Aweful agreement, it limits my possibilities to 3NT. Please pre alert that you play negative Dbl's through 3♦, I'll be more than happy to intervene with 3M :D
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0

#13 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-May-06, 03:25

3NT, and as others have said, change the agreement.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#14 User is offline   bucky 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 430
  • Joined: 2010-May-18

Posted 2010-May-18, 14:17

Coelacanth, on May 3 2010, 12:45 PM, said:

Dealer: North
Vul: None
Scoring: MP
♠ x
♥ Kx
♦ AKQxx
♣ Jxxxx
 

Partner, in first chair, opens 1♠.

RHO bids 3♥; LHO waffles a bit and says he thinks it is pre-emptive. (He happens to be right in this case)

Your agreement is that negative doubles apply thru 3♦.

Now what?

Even if double here is negative (as it should be), 3NT is still the most practical bid.
 
 
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users