[Bbradley62]

http://tinyurl.com/2dkntho

Only 2 of 67 Souths didn't bid some number of spades at their first opportunity. Individual tournament, South's profile simply says "sayc, 2/1".

[ArtK78]

I don't know what the point of this post is. But, if NS defend correctly, they get 1100 against 6♦x unless declarer plays specifically for honor and one heart in the South hand.

A very agressive 3♦ call by West and a very questionable decision by East to take a red against white sac against 6♣.

I see that, in playing out the hand, NS misdefended a trick. Unlucky.

[Bbradley62]

ArtK78, on Apr 28 2010, 01:01 PM, said:

I don't know what the point of this post is.

I guess I could have made that more clear

I think all four players made questionable bids, and wanted to see what anyone said about any of them.

[ONEferBRID]

Bbradley62, on Apr 28 2010, 12:20 PM, said:

ArtK78, on Apr 28 2010, 01:01 PM, said:

I don't know what the point of this post is.

I guess I could have made that more clear

I think all four players made questionable bids, and wanted to see what anyone said about any of them.

It looks like N/S were playing Bailey Cuebids.
Hence, ( 1 D ) - 2D! = Spades and one of the other 2 remaining ( Hts or Cl ) .

North had support for either Hts or Cl, with better Cl .