Forum indexed by search engines?
#1
Posted 2010-April-27, 02:08
It is a question of amending forums.bridgebase.com/robots.txt.
PS: It might be a good idea not to index the Water Cooler, as most of what it contains isn't really stuff bridgebase want to be associated with, I suppose.
#2
Posted 2010-April-27, 04:40
P.s. It's a great suggestion. Should certainly do it.
#3
Posted 2010-April-27, 05:01
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2010-April-27, 05:27
#5
Posted 2010-April-27, 07:09
#6
Posted 2010-April-27, 07:31
Anyway, it is frustrating that it is so difficult to find old threads.
#7
Posted 2010-April-27, 08:49
helene_t, on Apr 27 2010, 02:31 PM, said:
Maybe some posters should not use the internet for fun during work.
A posts in a thread like "how to kill time at work" could get them in trouble....
#8
Posted 2010-April-27, 10:02
gwnn, on Apr 27 2010, 06:01 AM, said:
You can become the guy that fixes bugs in the search engine.
#9
Posted 2010-April-27, 11:12
hotShot, on Apr 27 2010, 08:49 AM, said:
helene_t, on Apr 27 2010, 02:31 PM, said:
Maybe some posters should not use the internet for fun during work.
A posts in a thread like "how to kill time at work" could get them in trouble....
lol
bed
#10
Posted 2010-April-27, 13:57
helene_t, on Apr 27 2010, 09:31 AM, said:
Can't you use the forum's search page?
#13
Posted 2010-April-27, 21:51
barmar, on Apr 27 2010, 08:57 PM, said:
helene_t, on Apr 27 2010, 09:31 AM, said:
Can't you use the forum's search page?
Yes but it is very poor. It seems to have problems with words containing non-alphanumeric characters. It ignores words with less than four letters. It can't find synonyms, alternative verb forms etc. And above all, it has no way of accessing relevance (OK, relevance is tricky on a forum because internal links are not so widely used, maybe Google would not be great either. But surely better than the search page)

Help
