Page 1 of 1
disgusting
#1
Posted 2010-April-20, 19:16
QT
QTxxx
Kx
QJxx
AK9xxx
Ax
Qxxx
x
N passes at fav imps and it goes
p-p-1♠-2♣
what's your sequence thereafter? opps pass from now.
sorry if too ez
QTxxx
Kx
QJxx
AK9xxx
Ax
Qxxx
x
N passes at fav imps and it goes
p-p-1♠-2♣
what's your sequence thereafter? opps pass from now.
sorry if too ez
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2010-April-21, 00:41
I would double to show 4 hearts. If partner bids diamonds, I will bid hearts and he may understoand that I have 2-5 in the majors.
If he bids heart, I raise. If he bids NT I raise, if he bids 2 ♠ I pass.
So the further bidding here will be
X (pass) 2 ♦ (pass)
2 ♥ (pass) 2 ♠ all pass
If partner is not exactly on the same wavelength, he may pass 2 ♥, which is fine too.
If he bids heart, I raise. If he bids NT I raise, if he bids 2 ♠ I pass.
So the further bidding here will be
X (pass) 2 ♦ (pass)
2 ♥ (pass) 2 ♠ all pass
If partner is not exactly on the same wavelength, he may pass 2 ♥, which is fine too.
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#3
Posted 2010-April-21, 02:18
2♥, partner may have 3 of them and if he has a singleton he won't pass often, as he knows I am unlikely to have 6. If he passes with 2 hearts he probably doesn't have 6 spades as with a (sub)mininimum he would have opened 2♠. I think 2♥ always takes us to our best fit. Besides I don't want to encourage p to bid 3♦ if LHO bids 3♣.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
#6
Posted 2010-April-21, 13:14
2♥...2♠ seems easy enough. N would likely pass in a limited opening system, but others may want to stretch with 2N (QJXX of ♣s seems worthless in a suit contract).
I am guessing the other table landed in 3N and made
...
I am guessing the other table landed in 3N and made
foobar on BBO
#8
Posted 2010-April-21, 14:46
Quote
I might play 2♣X
Me too but after I pass (and I would) many pards would re-open with 2 diamonds or 2 spades.
2nt (or 3 spades) by me now should lead to either 3nt or 4 spades. No gaurantees, but I like our chances.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#9
Posted 2010-April-22, 17:45
I think planning to defend 2Cx at this vulnerability is very obvious. North has a clear pass, and south a clear reopening double even if North hesitated before passing.
#10
Posted 2010-April-23, 01:45
Fluffy, on Apr 22 2010, 05:08 AM, said:
I might play 2♣X
So a 6241 hand is a reopening double and a 2524 with the great QJxx in trumps, a possible 5/4 major fit is a clear pass?
Wow, had never occured to me.
Gonzalo, you are a Wundertüte. (Whatever this is in English or Spanish...)
Kind Regards
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2010-April-26, 10:47
If transfers are on the card, it's an easy 2♦ then 2♠. That seems to sum it up.
#12
Posted 2010-April-26, 10:50
well no theyre not on the card.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
George Carlin
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2010-April-26, 11:13
Codo, on Apr 23 2010, 07:45 AM, said:
Fluffy, on Apr 22 2010, 05:08 AM, said:
I might play 2♣X
So a 6241 hand is a reopening double and a 2524 with the great QJxx in trumps, a possible 5/4 major fit is a clear pass?
Wow, had never occured to me.
Gonzalo, you are a Wundertüte. (Whatever this is in English or Spanish...)
we double very agressivelly at the 2 level yes, but you have to see what kind of overcalls they do here!
Page 1 of 1

Help
