more matchpoints.... and it's a mixed pairs.....
#1
Posted 2010-March-31, 14:59
KQTx
xx
KT9x
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd.
You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
#2
Posted 2010-March-31, 15:06
You are missing the point of mixed pairs. It's not that half of each partnership is weak. It's that you are in a field of mostly irregular partnerships so there is a premium on pressure plays and making them defend.
#4
Posted 2010-March-31, 15:22
#5
Posted 2010-March-31, 16:12
wank, on Mar 31 2010, 03:59 PM, said:
KQTx
xx
KT9x
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd.
You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
doesn't 2♠ now show this hand?
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#6
Posted 2010-March-31, 16:17
My hand is perfect except for my dubious stopper in diamonds.
Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.
Best Regards Ole Berg
_____________________________________
We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:
- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.
Gnasher
#7
Posted 2010-March-31, 16:38
pooltuna, on Mar 31 2010, 05:12 PM, said:
No.
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 04:22 PM, said:
Saved gwnn some work:
http://forums.bridge...showtopic=32319
#8
Posted 2010-March-31, 16:45
655321, on Mar 31 2010, 05:38 PM, said:
Hah! I should revive this thread just to tell Han I disagree on passing a 2H raise with advancer's hand. But since he doesn't read too much forums these days he might miss it and it wouldn't be fun.
#9
Posted 2010-March-31, 17:03
jdonn, on Mar 31 2010, 04:22 PM, said:
Great thread, but different circumstances this time around.
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2010-March-31, 17:38
OleBerg, on Mar 31 2010, 05:17 PM, said:
My hand is perfect except for my dubious stopper in diamonds.
And here I thought a "dubious stopper" was something like JTx.
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#11
Posted 2010-March-31, 19:22
#12
Posted 2010-March-31, 21:06
The_Hog, on Mar 31 2010, 08:22 PM, said:
That's because the 2♦ bidders play that 2♠ guarantees 4 but no xtra values for their double. They think 2♠ is weird because we have all these xtras and we are underbidding by calling 2♠ and we are a ♠ short.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#13
Posted 2010-March-31, 21:22
pooltuna, on Apr 1 2010, 10:06 AM, said:
The_Hog, on Mar 31 2010, 08:22 PM, said:
That's because the 2♦ bidders play that 2♠ guarantees 4 but no xtra values for their double. They think 2♠ is weird because we have all these xtras and we are underbidding by calling 2♠ and we are a ♠ short.
Maybe, but the hand is not good enough for a 2D bid imo.
#14
Posted 2010-March-31, 21:44
#15
Posted 2010-March-31, 21:48
#16
Posted 2010-March-31, 22:06
xcurt, on Mar 31 2010, 10:44 PM, said:
To be fair, OP did admit that (consistent with his chosen username!) he is more interested in solitary activities than playing with a partner. I suspect that 2♠ isn't on the menu, perhaps we are supposed to choose between 1NT and 2♥?
#17
Posted 2010-March-31, 22:11
wank, on Mar 31 2010, 03:59 PM, said:
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd. You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
655321, on Mar 31 2010, 11:06 PM, said:
#18
Posted 2010-March-31, 23:25
wank, on Mar 31 2010, 03:59 PM, said:
KQTx
xx
KT9x
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd.
You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
Me Tarzan you Jane -attitude will do nothing good to your chances to do well in the event.
#19
Posted 2010-March-31, 23:31
wank, on Mar 31 2010, 03:59 PM, said:
KQTx
xx
KT9x
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd.
You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
2s no problem yet/
partner may think I have 16 or so...short d and good spades......but far less than a 2d cue bid.
#20
Posted 2010-March-31, 23:37
jukmoi, on Mar 31 2010, 09:25 PM, said:
wank, on Mar 31 2010, 03:59 PM, said:
KQTx
xx
KT9x
1D on your left (Acol so this is very likely LHO's longest suit), round to you, you X presumably, even in a mixed pairs. Partner bids 1S. Your turn again. You would like to hog if it's reasonable, but not if it's absurd.
You may not be sexist, but I am when it comes to bridge, so tough.
Me Tarzan you Jane -attitude will do nothing good to your chances to do well in the event.
At the risk of offending some people, one of the funnier quips I have heard is:
Me Tarzan You Jane - Kinky foursome!

Help
