Scoring: MP
KQ
KJ1096
J6
QJ87
and managed to escape the kiss of death -200, due to a defensive slip and scored -100. Somewhat surprisingly 2NT= is the par contract
Reflecting on the bidding during the play, I think Codo says it all:
Codo, on Mar 30 2010, 01:18 AM, said:
1 NT.
If partner had answered 1 NT to 1 ♠ I would like to play 2 ♦.
If partner had answered 2 ♣ to 1 ♠, I quite likely want to play 2♦.
So, if we are in the part score zone, our choice mostly matters if partner has a two suiter in hearts with a black suit. I bet that a two sutier in clubs is much more likely, so 1 N will win more often then 1♠.
And if we are in the game zone, we will still find 4 ♠, so that is no loss either.
If partner had answered 1 NT to 1 ♠ I would like to play 2 ♦.
If partner had answered 2 ♣ to 1 ♠, I quite likely want to play 2♦.
So, if we are in the part score zone, our choice mostly matters if partner has a two suiter in hearts with a black suit. I bet that a two sutier in clubs is much more likely, so 1 N will win more often then 1♠.
And if we are in the game zone, we will still find 4 ♠, so that is no loss either.
I would not dream of playing Bart and neither would any of my partners. I am quite enthusiatic about 2-way check back but only one f2f partner has been interested and my partner on the day was not. So I believe the odds favour 1NT as my response. It is ironic that had I been playing 2wnmf, then the odds would swing back to responding 1♠.
At a f2f MP club tourney last night, I held:
AQ42
6
K8752
652
Playing acol my partner opened 1♥. This time I think the odds overwhelmingly favour a response of 1♠, especially since 1♥ is opened with 44 in the majors 15-19HCP. Partner rebid 2♣ which I passed. Partner turned up with:
J7
A10972
J3
AQ97
The opps cards were badly placed going 1 off for -100, scoring 21 out of 32.

Help
