not a bad hand, buuut
#1
Posted 2010-March-29, 02:18
KQ863
974
AKx
(edit x=2)
4th seat, all white, imps
[P] - P - [2♠] - ?
do you come in here? if so, how?
say you do not:
[P] - P - [2♠] - P
[P] - X -- [P] -- ?
now what?
#2
Posted 2010-March-29, 03:41
3♥. Lucky I didnt bid previous round since surely parner woud raise to 4♥. I dont like our chances in 4♥ opposite a passed hand.
#3
Posted 2010-March-29, 04:53
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2010-March-29, 05:39
#6
Posted 2010-March-29, 08:01
pass and 4 ♥ without leb.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#7
Posted 2010-March-29, 08:22
I am not going to hang partner for balancing. Remember that partner will open the bidding freely (like most in these Fora). He didn't open the bidding. I expect to make 8-10 tricks.
LHO did not raise spades, so partner probably has at least 2 spades.
Bidding 4♥ could result in a making game some of the time. It could also run into a double by the passed hand partner of the 2♠ bidder some of the time.
#8
Posted 2010-March-29, 08:24
bed
#9
Posted 2010-March-29, 09:28
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 09:24 AM, said:
This is a bit sarcastic?
#10
Posted 2010-March-29, 09:40
jukmoi, on Mar 29 2010, 10:28 AM, said:
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 09:24 AM, said:
This is a bit sarcastic?
Did you notice we got all the spot cards except for the club? Could be a trap.
Did you also notice it's a balanced minimum opposite a passed hand?
bed
#11
Posted 2010-March-29, 10:12
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 10:40 AM, said:
jukmoi, on Mar 29 2010, 10:28 AM, said:
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 09:24 AM, said:
This is a bit sarcastic?
Did you notice we got all the spot cards except for the club? Could be a trap.
Did you also notice it's a balanced minimum opposite a passed hand?
Yes. That is why I suggested only 3..♥
#12
Posted 2010-March-29, 10:50
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 09:24 AM, said:
AK2.
sorry, was rather late when i was typing that in.
#13
Posted 2010-March-29, 10:56
matmat, on Mar 29 2010, 11:50 AM, said:
jjbrr, on Mar 29 2010, 09:24 AM, said:
AK2.
sorry, was rather late when i was typing that in.
Well that makes my bids clear imo. I thought the ♣x might be an Uno card or something and we'd have a different class of problems.
bed
#14
Posted 2010-March-29, 17:42
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#15
Posted 2010-March-29, 17:47
#16
Posted 2010-March-29, 20:45
#17
Posted 2010-March-29, 20:57
A non-leben 3H here shows a very strong hand in context. The passed hand doubler is allowed to raise with appropriate non-opening values.
#18
Posted 2010-March-29, 21:07
#19
Posted 2010-March-29, 21:15
cherdanno, on Mar 29 2010, 09:07 PM, said:
a narrow range, but wide in offensive playing strength. Some 9 or ten-counts are very much different from others.
#20
Posted 2010-March-29, 22:25

Help
