vat is
#1
Posted 2010-March-25, 08:08
2D is
a. diamonds weak
b. diamonds intermediate
c. diamonds strong
George Carlin
#2
Posted 2010-March-25, 08:18
gwnn, on Mar 25 2010, 09:08 AM, said:
2D is
a. diamonds weak
b. diamonds intermediate
c. diamonds strong
I assume that the 4NT call was an overcall to 2♦ and not a response.
First, it is bizarre and an invitation to disaster regardless of whether it has a worthwhile meaning.
Second, over a weak or even an intermediate 2♦ opening, since with a very strong balanced hand I would expect direct seat to double, the 4NT bid must show 10 playing tricks, a very strong hand, and a high card (A or K) control in diamonds. Something like:
AQ AQ Kx AKQJTxx
This would allow advancer to properly evaluate his aces and kings as tricks for slam purposes.
Over a strong 2♦ opening the 4NT bid is a puzzlement. It must show a wildly distributional hand with clubs and a major, but I can't imagine why someone would want to by-pass the 4 level to show this.
#3
Posted 2010-March-25, 08:21
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2010-March-25, 08:33
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#5
Posted 2010-March-25, 08:42
If 4♣ is just ♣, this should be ♣+M.
bed
#6
Posted 2010-March-25, 11:43
gwnn, on Mar 25 2010, 09:08 AM, said:
2D is
a. diamonds weak
b. diamonds intermediate
c. diamonds strong
2a]
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#8
Posted 2010-March-25, 14:04
pooltuna, on Mar 25 2010, 12:43 PM, said:
gwnn, on Mar 25 2010, 09:08 AM, said:
2D is
a. diamonds weak
b. diamonds intermediate
c. diamonds strong
2a]
So you are saying that 4NT is ace-asking?
#9
Posted 2010-March-25, 14:07
But there was definitely a post somewhere where Helene talked about this bid in the context of leaping michaels.
#11
Posted 2010-March-25, 15:53
If 2♦ is strong then it is clubs and a major
#13
Posted 2010-March-25, 18:51

Help
