What shall I bid? any difference if vulnerability differs
#1
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:04
Suppose you decide to double. Partner bids 3♥. What will you bid now?
#2
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:09
#3
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:11
pass 100
3♠ 10
x 0
now I have no idea.
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:16
#5
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:17
#6
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:20
Pict, on Mar 10 2010, 12:16 PM, said:
WHAT!? You are willing to protect your partner???? I don't think that is allowed on this forum
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:20
aguahombre, on Mar 10 2010, 12:17 PM, said:
I don't understand this comment at all.
#8
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:31
jdonn, on Mar 10 2010, 12:20 PM, said:
aguahombre, on Mar 10 2010, 12:17 PM, said:
I don't understand this comment at all.
I hope there are some things in the world worse than a bad bridge bid.
It used to be quite common (even among normalish people) to cater for partner having a penalty double. In part I posted to provoke a bit of reasoning on why that idea has died.
#9
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:38
gwnn, on Mar 10 2010, 12:11 PM, said:
pass 100
3♠ 10
x 0
now I have no idea.
Pass is 60; everything else is zero.
You don't get 100 for making obvious calls
Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
#10
Posted 2010-March-10, 11:48
#11
Posted 2010-March-10, 12:07
A lot of players reopen too lightly in this situation.
Excluding the often too conservative Americans of course.
#12
Posted 2010-March-10, 16:22
#13
Posted 2010-March-10, 16:29
pooltuna, on Mar 10 2010, 12:20 PM, said:
Do you think that the passers might be using judgment, instead of blindly parroting cliches?
I am sure many would indeed 'protect their partner' with KQJxxx KQx x Q109.
But possibly only Tuna Fish would protect his partner with KQJxxx x KQJ Qx - after all, if partner has a trap pass and we have KQJ of trumps, we need to double to protect partner...
#14
Posted 2010-March-10, 16:34
#15
Posted 2010-March-10, 17:04
If you pass or bid 3♠, partner will have x, AQx, Q10xxx, Jxx.
If you double, partner will have 10x, Qxx, Qxx, AKxxx and you'll play the wrong game.
#16
Posted 2010-March-10, 17:39
Pict, on Mar 10 2010, 05:34 PM, said:
I don't see anyone being emotional, just speaking strongly. But that's because the judgment in this case is so obvious.
#17
Posted 2010-March-11, 01:30
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#18
Posted 2010-March-11, 01:39
Cyberyeti, on Mar 10 2010, 06:04 PM, said:
I think passing (as responder) with this hand is wrong.
I would prefer 3NT (slight overbid) , or Double (slight missbid) to Passing.
#19
Posted 2010-March-11, 01:59
Pict, on Mar 10 2010, 12:31 PM, said:
The idea has not died. It just that with us holding ♦Kx it is not very likely that partner holds a penalty pass.
#20
Posted 2010-March-11, 02:24

Help
