BBO Discussion Forums: positive structure - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

positive structure

#1 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-February-26, 21:44

I like this. Inviting criticism and better ideas..

1C-1D=0-7

1H-S, S/H, S/C, S/D, 3
.....1N-S/H/3
..........2D-3, short minor
..........2H-reverser
.....2C-S/C
.....2D-S
.....2H-S/D reverser

1S-bal w/ 4 hearts, D/C, D, 3
.....2C-D/C
.....2D-bal with 4 hearts
.....2H-3, short M
.....2S-D, higher

1N-H, H/C

2C-H/D

2D-C

2H-bal w/ 4 spades, not hearts
.....opener can relay with either 2S or 2N

2S-bal w/ minors

2N-3334

3C-3343

Why don't I need the 3-level bids? Did I leave something out?
0

#2 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,655
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2010-February-26, 23:58

straube, on Feb 26 2010, 10:44 PM, said:

Why don't I need the 3-level bids? Did I leave something out?

It has to do with how you resolve the balanced hands.

Basically you have "unrolled" some of the balanced treatments into 2, 2N, 3 and compressed the shapely treatments. The balanced hands always resolved pretty low in symmetric relay.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#3 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-February-27, 00:42

Hm. Not seeing it. What have I lost steps on? I think it has something to do with the 5332s. Do I need to include them in the balanced hands? Then at 2D I've shown a 6-card suit?
0

#4 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,655
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2010-February-27, 08:43

If you look at standard symmetric relay, you have:

1 = hearts
.... 1N = both majors (next 2 = 3-suited)
.... 2 = hearts + clubs
.... 2, 2 = reds
.... 2+ = hearts only, includes 5332
1 = spades, not four hearts
.... 2 = spades + clubs
.... 2, 2 = spades + diamonds
.... 2+ = spades only, includes 5332
1N = balanced
2 = clubs or 3-suited short major (next 2 = 3-suited)
2 = diamonds
2+ = both minors

You can easily re-arrange things by "unrolling" the balanced hands and compressing the hands with diamonds or both minors such that:

1 = hearts
1 = spades, not four hearts
1N = diamonds or both minors
2 = clubs or 3-suited short major
2+ = balanced

However, the balanced hands resolve relatively cheaply, with many of them getting out at 2NT or 3, so you won't need all the direct three-level bids here. Arguably this is good because you need more space to locate honors opposite a balanced hand (four suits to worry about rather than three, basically).

You've performed some further rearranges, presumably to try to transfer declarership.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#5 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-February-27, 09:04

Thanks. I see it now. I haven't lost anything and I guess my 3-level bids are used to zoom QPs for the 3343.
0

#6 User is offline   straube 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,096
  • Joined: 2009-January-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Vancouver WA USA

Posted 2010-March-04, 01:14

So...can I use the 3-level to better effect?

For instance I could use 1C-3C to show an unspecified 7-cd suit with AKQ like Moscito does. How does that work exactly and are there any better ideas?
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users