BBO Discussion Forums: Brij is not Bridge - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Brij is not Bridge BW

#1 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2010-February-17, 14:48

Everytime new laws come out people usually complain about different aspects which changed from the previous one. When I had a look at the 2007's Duplicate Laws I thought RA's were being empowered immensely but I imagined this wouldn't come as a problem as bridge players should somehow be reasonable. But how long will it take till a RA deems a 2♥ weak natural opening illegal? Or a Multi 2♦? Isn't there a middle ground where both worlds can exist together? Is advanced announcing the solution?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,724
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-February-17, 14:52

The ACBL has already deemed a 1NT opening that can show nine HCPs inherently destructive and (essentially) banned it.

Same with a weak 2♥ opening that could be made with a HCP range of more than 7(???) points...

I think the answer to "How Long" is a midling large negative number...
Alderaan delenda est
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users