Cuebidding Kx(x)(x)
#1
Posted 2004-July-16, 11:51
Ex:
1♠ - 2♥
2♠ - 3♠
3NT (serious) - ??
and you hold
Kxx in clubs. Partner may bid a small slam, and we could go off 2 when a club is led and the A and Q are offside. If we don't cuebid clubs, partner may stop in game when he has the Q of clubs and small slam makes easily.
When cuebidding, should you just ignore this one case, as it is very likely the cuebidder or his/her partner has the Q and/or A? and do we just ignore this case since at worst the slam will be 50/50, depending on the location of the A of clubs?
Thanks.
#3
Posted 2004-July-16, 12:02
The logical lead was the other minor but dummy was so nervous that I decided 4♣ could have been a fake cuebid and lead clubs anyway.
One down.
When asked why he didn't double 4♣ my pd said one of his now famous phrases "If I double 4♣ they don't play slam, then why dbl if they can't make it?"
:-)
#4
Posted 2004-July-16, 13:09
#5
Posted 2004-July-16, 14:52
1. Pard may have the Queen and itching to hear the cue
2. Pard may have xx and the A♣ may be on side.
3. Pard may hold the Jack and the suit is frozen.
4. Pard may hold the Ace and the King fills up the suit
Please God rescue me from the day one of my opponents finds an underlead from the Ace after I cue a King.
#6
Posted 2004-July-16, 16:35
#7
Posted 2004-July-16, 22:49
On the balance of probabilities Kx will be vulnerable less often than not.
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#8
Posted 2004-July-17, 03:24
If AQ is offside I'm down. So what? I could be hit by a tram as well.
#9
Posted 2004-July-17, 18:08
There could be a natural lead of QJ10x etc through your Kx(x).
But "so what" is the best response.
In the bidding Kx is worth around 3/4 of a trick assuming your side does not have the Queen and even better when he does have the Queen.
In the bidding it will be a control for slam when:
Partner has the Ace 1/3
Partner has the Queen 1/3
Partner has the Jack and your RHO has the Queen
RHO has the Ace
I reckon this is about 80%
I believe that the USA currently hold only the World Championship For People Who Still Bid Like Your Auntie Gladys - dburn
dunno how to play 4 card majors - JLOGIC
True but I know Standard American and what better reason could I have for playing Precision? - Hideous Hog
Bidding is an estimation of probabilities SJ Simon
#10
Posted 2004-July-18, 04:28
I have a simple rule: do I or don't I have a 1st or 2nd round control in 'any' case? Here I don't have it! What happens if someone underleads his ♣A and p has only the J? You'll play small and also lose 2 ♣-tricks while you could've made it. I don't like it.
However, I think we can go on for another round of control bidding, so then I'll bid it. P with Qx will know I have Kx or so, and can still continue to slam.
I rather be in a game +2, than in a slam on finesse, unless I'm in a tourney where I know lots of slams make on finesses
#11
Posted 2004-July-18, 04:48
#12
Posted 2004-July-18, 06:20
If I do not bid a club control, partner will sign off with Qx(x) in clubs immediately, and might not play with me again... at least, not when serious (some people would write: no pun intended.... I won't..).
#14
Posted 2004-July-20, 03:55
Cascade, on Jul 17 2004, 07:08 PM, said:
That says everything !
Of course I cue bid

Help