Posted 2010-January-31, 05:07
When both partners know that declarer has a singleton, and both partners know that the other one knows, it should be suit preference. If we can trust declarer, that should apply here, though it might be unwise to assume that without agreement.
Anyway, we should be able to work this out without help from partner. Suppose that opener has AKx Q AKQJxxxx x. A heart switch is necessary to prevent the strip squeeze. I can't think of any layout even vaguely consistent with the bidding where a heart costs or another suit is necessary.
On the other hand, what is partner up to? He appears to have played ♣6 from J762. If he thinks it's count, he should have played the 7. If he thinks it's suit preference, he should have told me where his ace is. Is he playing a middle card because he has an honour in each of the other suits? Maybe he's worried that declarer has Ax Q AKQJ1098xx x, and thinks we might need a spade switch before a heart is played. Or maybe he just hasn't spotted the strip squeeze.
I'll play a heart, prepared to look very foolish if declarer has some absurdity like x AQx AKQJxxx xx.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
Pass (4NT) Pass (5♣)
Pass (5♦) All pass