BBO Discussion Forums: atb - defense - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

atb - defense

#1 User is offline   karlson 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 974
  • Joined: 2005-April-06

Posted 2010-January-31, 02:04

Scoring: MP

1♣-p-2♦-2♥
2N-3♥-ppp


2♦ was weak, and 2N was good/bad, showing a competitive 3m bid. NS play udca.

T1: ♦K-4-2-9
T2: ♣A-2-6-4
T2: ♠K
0

#2 User is offline   hanp 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,987
  • Joined: 2009-February-15

Posted 2010-January-31, 05:01

I blame 2D, the methods (2NT G/B after the weak 2D) and the spade king. I like the diamond 2 and the club 6 is flawless.
and the result can be plotted on a graph.
0

#3 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-January-31, 05:11

hanp, on Jan 31 2010, 12:01 PM, said:

I blame 2D, the methods (2NT G/B after the weak 2D) and the spade king. I like the diamond 2 and the club 6 is flawless.

What about the opening lead? Maybe a non-systemic ♣A followed by ♦K would show a singleton. Then we would still just manage 2 down: overtake the diamond, diamond ruff, club ruff, diamond ruff, spade switch to break up the squeeze.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#4 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2010-February-01, 04:20

You missed 4 spade because you bid 2 diamond. Bad... But okay, hard to reach four spade anyway.

You did not defeat 3 Hearts because you did not read partners marks or because you play the wrong marks. Worse.....
Kind Regards

Roland

Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-February-01, 05:41

How do you make 4♠?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users