Your lead at BAM is...?
Lead choice BAM, sittiing South
#1
Posted 2010-January-28, 12:01
Your lead at BAM is...?
East4Evil ♥ sohcahtoa 4ever!!!!!1
#3
Posted 2010-January-28, 12:41
kayin801, on Jan 28 2010, 01:01 PM, said:
1♦-(1♠)-P-(2♥)-
P-(3♥)-AP
Your lead at BAM is...?
4♥
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#4
Posted 2010-January-28, 12:43
#5
Posted 2010-January-28, 18:16
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
#7
Posted 2010-January-28, 19:01
Basically I agree with jdonn
#8
Posted 2010-January-28, 19:22
jdonn, on Jan 28 2010, 01:43 PM, said:
I agree with a club, and don't regard as a spade as that safe. As I have the 10, there is a big risk of a layout of something like AJxxx opposite K9 where the lead may cost. So, the club is not much riskier anyway.
#9
Posted 2010-January-28, 20:50
lamford, on Jan 28 2010, 08:22 PM, said:
jdonn, on Jan 28 2010, 01:43 PM, said:
I agree with a club, and don't regard as a spade as that safe. As I have the 10, there is a big risk of a layout of something like AJxxx opposite K9 where the lead may cost. So, the club is not much riskier anyway.
You have come up with one specific and unlikely layout where a spade has MAYBE cost a trick (it's not like you blow a trick that you had coming, you give them one extra trick, and quite possibly the 3rd pitch doesn't matter at all), and deem that as almost as risky as a club, which can cost a trick quite easily?
Ok then.
Blowing a tempo is a huge concern but a spade trick costs by setting up a trick for them probably 1 % of the time.
#10
Posted 2010-January-29, 01:32
At imps I would led more aggressive, it would be a club. But at BAM it is tricky.
Roland
Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
#11
Posted 2010-January-29, 02:03
#12
Posted 2010-January-29, 03:22
Jlall, on Jan 29 2010, 02:01 AM, said:
The lead is intended to be aggressive and not passive.
Maybe I'm overestimating the gain but:
opener has shown 9 cards in the majors, so he probably is 3-1 in the minors and there is a chance that openers hand will ruff more than 1 trick.
Responder should not have 3 ♠ as he did not support them, so openers spade length can be established and partners possible ♠ stopper could easily be ruffed.
With a 4-4 fit I can't keep opps from ruffing a trick at each hand, but I can try to make it harder for them to ruff 2 tricks at one side or setting up a cross ruff.
Leading ♠ helps to set up a ruffing finesse against my partner, and leading the wrong minor could create easy ruff entries to the ♠.
If I wanted a passive lead, I would have chosen a ♣.
#13
Posted 2010-January-29, 10:10
PhantomSac, on Jan 28 2010, 09:50 PM, said:
I agree a club could cost a trick quite easily, but leading the opponent's first bid suit is certainly likely to cost a trick, much more than 1% of the time. I gave one example; K98xx opposite Qx is another. But I agree that it won't necessarily cost your side a trick that it would have won in this suit, but a mixture of establishing the suit and a tempo. And why is this so unlikely; surely 5-2 spades is the most probable layout for the opponents?
#14
Posted 2010-January-29, 10:42
hotShot, on Jan 29 2010, 08:22 PM, said:
That's a new one.
Personally I also think a club lead would be termed 'aggressive' and a spade lead 'passive'. Basically if you don't lead a club there's a chance that declarer can set up spades and pitch his club(s) (before their club ace is knocked out) on the spade winners.
We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.

Help

1♦-(1♠)-P-(2♥)-
P-(3♥)-AP