BBO Discussion Forums: What do you open and how do you follow up? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What do you open and how do you follow up?

#1 User is offline   Dirk Kuijt 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 130
  • Joined: 2009-December-26

Posted 2010-January-25, 23:35

Scoring: MP

The bidding goes:
P-P-P-?

The follow up: If you open 1♥ it goes P-1♠-P-? Now what are you worth?

codo said:

It is a fact that most people here write as if their opinion is a dogmatic fact.

eugene hung said:

My opinion is that this ought to win the award for best self-referential quote of the new year.
0

#2 User is offline   PFormaini 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 137
  • Joined: 2009-May-20

Posted 2010-January-25, 23:51

Dirk Kuijt, on Jan 26 2010, 12:35 AM, said:

Scoring: MP

The bidding goes:
P-P-P-?

The follow up: If you open 1♥ it goes P-1♠-P-? Now what are you worth?

A lot is going to depend on System, but I would:

1. Open 1 HEART.

2. Rebid 3 HEARTS over partner's 1 SPADE.
0

#3 User is offline   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,083
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2010-January-26, 02:40

Probably wrong but I'll bid 4♠.

View Postwyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


View Postrbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#4 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-January-26, 03:51

I open 4♥, I am a simple soul and don't mind overbidding every once in a while.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#5 User is offline   ochinko 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 647
  • Joined: 2004-May-27
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:Cooking

Posted 2010-January-26, 03:58

I don't have a single Ace, partner has at most two. Slam requires both a perfect hand from partner and a bad defense. Why then give a chance for opps to get in the bidding? Just open 4♥, and be done with it.
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-January-26, 06:23

yep, 4♥ not perfect because of the stiff King, but opponents will have a blind lead.
0

#7 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-January-26, 07:37

I think this is a 3♥ bid in fourth seat. That will be high enough to keep the opponents out, but invites partner to bid game with a suitable hand, eg one with two aces.

We might miss some games where he has a perfect spade holding like QJx, but we'll gain on the more frequent occasions when his slow values are in the minors instead.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#8 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2010-January-26, 10:26

I agree with 3♥ in 4th seat. Consider that there could be two heart losers as well and I don't want to go too crazy. Also this is plenty of preemption considering I don't mind if they bid spades, the opponents are both almost sure to stay out at this high of a level.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#9 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2010-January-26, 10:31

I would just bid 1H. I have spades so I'm not concerned with preempting them at all. I am more worried about playing 3H-1 when I could have played 2H than I am about the opps bidding 4 of a minor.

4H seems lol, we need a ton for game and we're playing MP, why just decide to go minus a huge portion of the time in 4th seat when we usually get to game by opening 1H anyways?
0

#10 User is offline   hrothgar 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,725
  • Joined: 2003-February-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Natick, MA
  • Interests:Travel
    Cooking
    Brewing
    Hiking

Posted 2010-January-26, 10:38

Jlall, on Jan 26 2010, 07:31 PM, said:

I would just bid 1H. I have spades so I'm not concerned with preempting them at all. I am more worried about playing 3H-1 when I could have played 2H than I am about the opps bidding 4 of a minor.

4H seems lol, we need a ton for game and we're playing MP, why just decide to go minus a huge portion of the time in 4th seat when we usually get to game by opening 1H anyways?

Justin raises what I THINK is the critical point:

In order to beat "Pass Out" we need to guaruntee ourselves a positive score. We aren't trying to jam the opponent's auction or make a reasonable pre-sac against their 4m partial.

We need to go positive to beat "Pass"
Alderaan delenda est
0

#11 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2010-January-26, 12:01

hrothgar, on Jan 26 2010, 06:38 PM, said:

Jlall, on Jan 26 2010, 07:31 PM, said:

I would just bid 1H. I have spades so I'm not concerned with preempting them at all. I am more worried about playing 3H-1 when I could have played 2H than I am about the opps bidding 4 of a minor.

4H seems lol, we need a ton for game and we're playing MP, why just decide to go minus a huge portion of the time in 4th seat when we usually get to game by opening 1H anyways?

Justin raises what I THINK is the critical point:

In order to beat "Pass Out" we need to guaruntee ourselves a positive score. We aren't trying to jam the opponent's auction or make a reasonable pre-sac against their 4m partial.

We need to go positive to beat "Pass"

I think that's too academic when we can say with almost 100% certainty, that "all pass" will be the result at 0 of the other tables. So that can't really be the score to beat.
Michael Askgaard
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users