[P_Marlowe]

gwnn, on Jan 4 2010, 08:30 AM, said:

well if 2♣ set a GF, 3♥ is GF with hearts isn't it? how else can you show a good raise? are you trying to say that

1♥-2♣
2♥-2♠
2NT-3♥

could possibly ever imply better support than

1♥-2♣
2♥-3♥

?

who has these agreements?

Hi,

Look at one of my responses.

It can be argued, that opener showed a 6 carder in the first seq., so that
a supp. showing 3H bin in the firts needs only be based on 2 cards.

The second seq. typically showes 3 card support.

With kind regards
Marlowe

[jdonn]

Even if 2♥ promised 6 then 4NT should be quantitative.

[Codo]

gwnn, on Jan 4 2010, 10:30 PM, said:

well if 2♣ set a GF, 3♥ is GF with hearts isn't it? how else can you show a good raise? are you trying to say that

1♥-2♣
2♥-2♠
2NT-3♥

could possibly ever imply better support than

1♥-2♣
2♥-3♥

?

who has these agreements?

tx, yes now I understood that I wrote rubbish.