gwnn, on Dec 25 2009, 12:23 AM, said:
all things being equal it is not very good to open 2♣ on a 2 suiter but this 2 suiter is just a touch too strong for me. I don't think it's a big deal though. I'm surprised you feel so strongly about it Gonzalo.
I don't see the winning of 2♣, it makes us vulnerable to preemption AND we don't rate to make game opposite a yarborough.
I normally hate the 2♣ openings because of space consumption but agree that opening 1x risks misisng a game, so it has its advantages. But this time there is normally no game if partner is broke!
If partner opens 2♣ I think responder has an obvious 3♣ response, but obviously that's my 2♣ opening style.

Help
