BBO Discussion Forums: Splinter or not? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Splinter or not?

Poll: 1H-1S-? (19 member(s) have cast votes)

1H-1S-?

  1. 2S (8 votes [42.11%])

    Percentage of vote: 42.11%

  2. 3C=splinter, 12-14 or 18-19 (11 votes [57.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 57.89%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:36

Scoring: IMP

1-1
??
 
We have the agreement that 3 is a splinter with 4c and 12-14 or 18-19. And 2 is a normal raise (we don't raise often with a 3c).
My partner prefers 3 to show an unbalanced distribution. 2 would show a more balanced hand.
I prefer 2 because with the minimal hand the Q singleton is not worth to be mentioned. Partner will also mis-evaluate Kxxx and with xxxx he will expect more pts in the other suits.
....Given the bidding agreements, what bid do you prefer?
0

#2 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Göttingen, Germany
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:38

I don't understand. Your partner likes a splinter to show an unbalanced hand and you don't? Why not? I think your partner has a point.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#3 User is offline   helene_t 

  • The Abbess
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,082
  • Joined: 2004-April-22
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:UK

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:40

12-14 means that 12 is the minimum strength for an unbalanced opener? If so I have to splinter wiht this hand according to system I think. Then again maybe I shouldn't have opened this hand.

I take it that this hand evaluates to 12 (since I opened) so I voted 3. If 12-14 is meant to exclude minimal hands, though, I would bid 2.
The world would be such a happy place, if only everyone played Acol :) --- TramTicket
0

#4 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:49

So if 3 is splinter after 1-1, then how would you bid Kx AKJxx x KQJxx or similar? Just curious ...
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#5 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:51

billw55, on Nov 25 2009, 04:49 PM, said:

So if 3 is splinter after 1-1, then how would you bid Kx AKJxx x KQJxx or similar? Just curious ...

2 forcing.
0

#6 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2009-November-25, 08:54

I don't understand why we would have an agreement to force the three-level with 12 HCP and a stiff. I understand this less when we have 9 HCP and a stiff.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#7 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2009-November-25, 09:13

Given the bidding agreements, I bid 3 if it shows my hand. Long time ago I used to play this style as well and had come to hate it. If your partner prefers 3 to be unbalanced just like we have here, then isn't it better if we bid this so he can judge better as he will be expecting 2 to be the balanced type.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#8 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-November-25, 09:24

gwnn, on Nov 25 2009, 04:38 PM, said:

I don't understand. Your partner likes a splinter to show an unbalanced hand and you don't? Why not? I think your partner has a point.

I would if Q was Q or Q, but with singleton Q I think 3 gives a misdescription of where my points are?
0

#9 User is offline   billw55 

  • enigmatic
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,757
  • Joined: 2009-July-31
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-25, 09:25

kgr, on Nov 25 2009, 09:51 AM, said:

billw55, on Nov 25 2009, 04:49 PM, said:

So if 3 is splinter after 1-1, then how would you bid Kx AKJxx x KQJxx or similar?  Just curious ...

2 forcing.

Ok, I'm with you so far.

So then what if you hold say x KJxxx Qxx AQxx and wish to rebid 2 nonforcing?
Life is long and beautiful, if bad things happen, good things will follow.
-gwnn
0

#10 User is offline   kgr 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,425
  • Joined: 2003-April-11

Posted 2009-November-25, 09:34

billw55, on Nov 25 2009, 05:25 PM, said:

kgr, on Nov 25 2009, 09:51 AM, said:

billw55, on Nov 25 2009, 04:49 PM, said:

So if 3 is splinter after 1-1, then how would you bid Kx AKJxx x KQJxx or similar?  Just curious ...

2 forcing.

Ok, I'm with you so far.

So then what if you hold say x KJxxx Qxx AQxx and wish to rebid 2 nonforcing?

1NT (we rather bid 1NT on hands like that because we play 2C forcing)
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-25, 10:20

If "12-14" means "12-14 in high cards", then this is a 2 bid, because this hand doesn't contain 12 HCP.

If "12-14" really means "opening strength up to 14 HCP", then it's a splinter. This hand is closer to A9xx KQxxx Qxx x than to A9xx KQxxx xx Qx.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-25, 10:31

I love the splinter since you can make it on the 3 level. It shows a minimum strength hand, which you have. Your playing strength is very good, so go for it.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#13 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-November-25, 14:33

3C
0

#14 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,044
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-25, 14:41

Hi,

Given the 6-4 distribution, the hand is worth a splinter.
In general, if I would ever play your agreement set, I would always
make the splinter, i.e. 2S ist either a 3 card raise or 5422, and if you
rule out 3 card raises, 5422 it is.
Of course you can also say, that the splinter showes a real opening bid
you are not ashamed of, and than some submin openers will have to go
via 2S as well.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#15 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,044
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-25, 14:43

kgr, on Nov 25 2009, 10:24 AM, said:

gwnn, on Nov 25 2009, 04:38 PM, said:

I don't understand. Your partner likes a splinter to show an unbalanced hand and you don't? Why not? I think your partner has a point.

I would if Q was Q or Q, but with singleton Q I think 3 gives a misdescription of where my points are?

The question is, why did you open the hand in the first place?
Rule of 20 with the single Queen?

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#16 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2009-November-25, 14:47

kgr, on Nov 25 2009, 09:36 AM, said:

Scoring: IMP

1-1
??
We have the agreement that 3 is a splinter with 4c and 12-14 or 18-19. And 2 is a normal raise (we don't raise often with a 3c).
My partner prefers 3 to show an unbalanced distribution. 2 would show a more balanced hand.
I prefer 2 because with the minimal hand the Q singleton is not worth to be mentioned. Partner will also mis-evaluate Kxxx and with xxxx he will expect more pts in the other suits.
....Given the bidding agreements, what bid do you prefer?

IMO 3 = 10, 3 = 6, 2 = 5.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users