Notice of Thread/Post Moderation A place where moderators describe action
#264
Posted 2012-March-30, 11:11
#265
Posted 2012-April-02, 09:28
#266
Posted 2012-April-02, 23:48
Also I reopened the thread in the novice/beginner forum that I locked a few days ago (opened it much earlier).
#268
Posted 2012-April-05, 08:06
#269
Posted 2012-April-05, 08:28
barmar, on 2012-April-03, 13:14, said:
Too many generals in this outfit.
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#270
Posted 2012-April-05, 11:19
blackshoe, on 2012-April-05, 08:28, said:
Looks more like a good checks-and-balances thing to me. Barmar did not usurp inquiry's decision, but rather noticed he hadn't done what he said he did...and fixed it.
#271
Posted 2012-April-05, 12:18
aguahombre, on 2012-April-05, 11:19, said:
I think you missed the pun.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
#273
Posted 2012-April-05, 23:13
As for tv, screw it. You aren't missing anything. -- Ken Berg
Our ultimate goal on defense is to know by trick two or three everyone's hand at the table. -- Mike777
I have come to realise it is futile to expect or hope a regular club game will be run in accordance with the laws. -- Jillybean
#274
Posted 2012-April-08, 08:22
#275
Posted 2012-April-10, 08:25
#276
Posted 2012-April-10, 09:18
barmar, on 2012-April-10, 08:25, said:
Although the thread got cluttered by complaints on the real person's bidding, the OP clearly belonged in the "Suggestions" forum. The desciptions of bids, and the actual bidding by the Bot really need fixing.
#277
Posted 2012-April-10, 10:16
aguahombre, on 2012-April-10, 09:18, said:
The first-listed purpose of the GIB forum is to report GIB bugs, which certainly includes the situation(s) on that hand.
#278
Posted 2012-April-10, 10:30
aguahombre, on 2012-April-10, 09:18, said:
Do you have any idea how flooded the "Suggestions" forum would be if this criterium was applied?
-- Bertrand Russell
#279
Posted 2012-April-10, 10:52
mgoetze, on 2012-April-10, 10:30, said:
I assume that is a rhetorical question, underlining a need for the BOT people to re-examine the alleged explanations of calls.
#280
Posted 2012-April-11, 22:51
#281
Posted 2012-April-11, 22:55
aguahombre, on 2012-April-10, 10:52, said:
We're fully aware that GIB doesn't approach the same quality standards as the rest of BBO. But it's a much harder problem to solve. Improving the explanations is part of our general maintenance of GIB. But we can only address them on a case by case basis, there's no general solution to the problem.
#282
Posted 2012-April-12, 13:00
#283
Posted 2012-April-16, 13:04

Help
