Reverse
#1
Posted 2009-November-21, 16:50
what do you open this hand?
i would open it 1♥ but it was suggested to me that 1♠ was better
#2
Posted 2009-November-21, 16:54
#3
Posted 2009-November-21, 16:54
Now, if I could open a forcing 2-bid and then show a 6-5 hand with two losers, now that would be tremendous. A theme, it seems, at least recently. I keep seeing this. Maybe 2♣...4♥ could show this?
-P.J. Painter.
#4
Posted 2009-November-21, 16:55
#5
Posted 2009-November-21, 17:02
ONEferBRID, on Nov 21 2009, 05:55 PM, said:
And let's say you are playing 2/1 GF, and partner makes a 2m GF bid over your 1H open. 2S now does not say anything about strength . Your 3S call next, however, will show your 5s/6h shape.
#6
Posted 2009-November-21, 18:14
kenrexford, on Nov 21 2009, 05:54 PM, said:
Now, if I could open a forcing 2-bid and then show a 6-5 hand with two losers, now that would be tremendous. A theme, it seems, at least recently. I keep seeing this. Maybe 2♣...4♥ could show this?
The last time I constructed 2C response system it included 5-5 or better major hands. All the secondary jumps to 4C, 4D, 4H, showed extra length in one of the suits, i.e., 4C=65, 4D=56, 4H=equal length.
#7
Posted 2009-November-21, 18:39
ONEferBRID, on Nov 22 2009, 06:02 AM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Nov 21 2009, 05:55 PM, said:
And let's say you are playing 2/1 GF, and partner makes a 2m GF bid over your 1H open. 2S now does not say anything about strength . Your 3S call next, however, will show your 5s/6h shape.
Don't generalise.
Maybe not in your system, however there are many variants of 2/1 where a reverse certainly promises extra strength. Just look up some old posts on this topic. Mind you, this hand is certainly worth a reverse, of course.
#8
Posted 2009-November-21, 20:12
The_Hog, on Nov 21 2009, 07:39 PM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Nov 22 2009, 06:02 AM, said:
ONEferBRID, on Nov 21 2009, 05:55 PM, said:
And let's say you are playing 2/1 GF, and partner makes a 2m GF bid over your 1H open. 2S now does not say anything about strength . Your 3S call next, however, will show your 5s/6h shape.
Don't generalise.
Maybe not in your system, however there are many variants of 2/1 where a reverse certainly promises extra strength. Just look up some old posts on this topic. Mind you, this hand is certainly worth a reverse, of course.
I should have said in "standard 2/1" .
Yes, one of those posts was my variant, which can show a strong revers over a 2/1 of 1H open.
#9
Posted 2009-November-21, 20:19
dude42387, on Nov 21 2009, 04:50 PM, said:
what do you open this hand?
i would open it 1♥ but it was suggested to me that 1♠ was better
May I suggest that whom ever suggested opening 1♠ here is an idiot.
#10
Posted 2009-November-21, 21:26
Call me Desdinova...Eternal Light
C. It's the nexus of the crisis and the origin of storms.
IV: ace 333: pot should be game, idk
e: "Maybe God remembered how cute you were as a carrot."
#11
Posted 2009-November-21, 22:40
Lobowolf, on Nov 21 2009, 10:26 PM, said:
doesn't need sugar coating when he is right
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#12
Posted 2009-November-22, 02:14
#14
Posted 2009-November-22, 21:59
dude42387, on Nov 21 2009, 05:50 PM, said:
what do you open this hand?
i would open it 1♥ but it was suggested to me that 1♠ was better
on bbo forum......you shall learn all two suiters are opened at one level unless much much more
not sure why one spade is ever the best bid....
#15
Posted 2009-November-22, 22:28
Well Mike, this one is a 1S opening in my book:
AJxxx AQxxxx x x
Its not good enough to reverse.
#16
Posted 2009-November-23, 10:53
The only alternative to discuss is 2C, the hand is certainly powerful enough,
but given that you have longer hearts, than spades, it will get awkward
showing both suits at a reasonable level, so 1H it is.
Playing 2/1 with constructive raises, and a weak 4-7 raise included in the
forcing NT helps, but even if not, I would not worry that 1H gets passed out.
With kind regards
Marlowe
PS: Opening the shorter suit with a 65 hand is a reasonable approach, but
this assumes, that the hand is not worth an reverse, and with a 65 hand, the
req. for a reverse drop.
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#17
Posted 2009-November-23, 18:26
P_Marlowe, on Nov 23 2009, 11:53 PM, said:
Opening the shorter suit with a 65 hand is a reasonable approach, but
this assumes, that the hand is not worth an reverse, and with a 65 hand, the
req. for a reverse drop.
The requirements don't drop, Uwe. If the hand is a fit, then you are in a good position - otherwise....

Help