Compensation Table Duplicate bridge with 4 players
#1
Posted 2009-November-22, 09:55
two teams match where the closed room results are taken from the table
taking the high card points and distribution into account. Table was
calculated on the basis of over 60,000 results from world class
players.
Take a look: http://www.compensationtable.com
Any kind of questions and feedback is welcome.
#2
Posted 2009-November-23, 18:06
#3
Posted 2009-November-23, 18:41
teinemaa, on Nov 22 2009, 03:55 PM, said:
two teams match where the closed room results are taken from the table
taking the high card points and distribution into account. Table was
calculated on the basis of over 60,000 results from world class
players.
Take a look: http://www.compensationtable.com
Any kind of questions and feedback is welcome.
Interesting. It would be interesting to see how it works in money bridge IMO.
#4
Posted 2009-November-24, 07:01
georgeac, on Nov 23 2009, 07:06 PM, said:
Basically it is a modified version of russian scoring.
http://www.pagat.com...icago%20-%20rus
The adv. is, that russian scoring only looks at HCP, in contrast this modified
version takes the degreet of fit you have into the consideration as well.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2009-November-24, 07:04
#6
Posted 2009-November-24, 07:07
helene_t, on Nov 24 2009, 08:04 AM, said:
One sides plays?
And if you have a double fit, you take the combined length of the trump
suit you choose?
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2009-November-24, 07:10
P_Marlowe, on Nov 24 2009, 02:07 PM, said:
And if you have a double fit, you take the combined length of the trump
suit you choose?
With kind regards
Marlowe
No, the par score does not depend on what happend at the table. For all we know, the board might have been passed out.
#8
Posted 2009-November-24, 07:33
helene_t, on Nov 24 2009, 08:10 AM, said:
P_Marlowe, on Nov 24 2009, 02:07 PM, said:
And if you have a double fit, you take the combined length of the trump
suit you choose?
With kind regards
Marlowe
No, the par score does not depend on what happend at the table. For all we know, the board might have been passed out.
I doubt, that the table displayes the part score.
In Russian Scoring you run against the Expected Score given a
certain amount of HCP you hold, and if you use the alternative table,
you basically run against the Expected Score given a certain amount
of HCP, and the fit you have with p.
Taking the degree of fit into acount to calculate the Expected Score is
certainly a sensible improvement over tradional method of Russian
Scoring.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted 2009-November-24, 09:58
georgeac said:
Lets say these who made 4H had 25 HCPs and 9-card heart fit and are expected to get 390 points. But they got 420 so it is 1 IMP for them.
junyi_zhu said:
You can find out
P_Marlowe said:
http://www.pagat.com...icago%20-%20rus
The adv. is, that russian scoring only looks at HCP, in contrast this modified
version takes the degreet of fit you have into the consideration as well.
With kind regards
Marlowe
I never heard the term Russian Scoring before. Thanks for that information. The other big advantage is that Russian Scoring is made about 20 years ago (I thought this method was forgotten). The Portable Bridge Notation, which is standard to store bridge deals in computer files, is 10 years old. So the Russian Scoring is probably based on some deals and creators experience, but my table is based on over 30 000 deals played by expert players.
helene_t said:
Before creating this table, I thought about the 20 HCPs problem. My first idea was that line with more cards in spade suit should score. My last idea was to make it as simple and fast as possible so the line how started bidding should score.
Thanks for feedback,
Tanel
#10
Posted 2009-November-24, 10:10
P_Marlowe, on Nov 24 2009, 02:33 PM, said:
par score, not part score. anyway par score is not the correct term I think, datum score it must be. sr.
Tx for clarrification, and welcome to the forum, teinemaa!
#11
Posted 2009-November-24, 10:37
So I want to make this table as popular as possible to make more people to play bridge. I would be really happy, if you have any ideas how to make this table more popular.
#12
Posted 2009-November-24, 10:53
partscore=50
game=300
small slam=800
grand slam=1300
than what the official 50, 300, 500, 500 and then needing to explain that the 50 for the partscore applies only for partscores but the other ones are additive.
George Carlin
#13
Posted 2009-November-28, 19:58
Unless explicitly stated, none of my views here can be taken to represent SCBA or any other organizations.

Help