Posted 2009-November-20, 16:55
IMO, assessing merits of a specific cue definition outside of a complete context is potentially misleading. I like and use this meaning (two of the top three honors). But, that decision is conditioned on several assumptions, including the availablility of Last Train, Serious 3NT, and my understandings of when to use these. As an example of a "strange" application upon which I condition my meanings is that I might bid 3NT (serious) in some circumstances to show a "perfect minimum," meaning high control count and high cover count for a simple minimum. That's a tad unusual. Or, a "serious 3NT" to handle "touching controls" situations. Strange nuances like that.
My suggestion is to think through your set of agreements to decide what makes sense. Some variations that I have seen include a cuebid of a side suit with 2/3 top OR the Ace, 2/3 top INCLUDING the Ace, or even just a control. You could even plausibly have a variation like where a cuebid in this sequence of 4♣ promises the Ace or King of clubs and either two of the top three clubs or two of the top three trumps. Call it a "good stuff" cue. Thus, you would only cue 4♣ with the sole Ace or King if your trumps are KQ or better. You can probably imagine how this might be useful info for partner.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.