what now?
#1
Posted 2009-November-02, 13:10
no one vul at imps
(p) p (1!d) x
(p) 1!h (2!c) ?
OOPS!!!! here's your hand
KT95
AQ9
AQ4
KJ3
#2
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:10
Edit: now that we see our cards I'd Double again, showing values. I'll then pass 2♥, and bid some NT otherwise.
#3
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:15
George Carlin
#4
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:29
ghow, on Nov 2 2009, 02:10 PM, said:
no one vul at imps
(p) p (1!d) x
(p) 1!h (2!c) ?
OOPS!!!! here's your hand
KT95
AQ9
AQ4
KJ3
unlike many of the clowns out there who bid 2♥ with any minmal TOX hand that has 4♥ I actually promise xtra values when I bid 2♥ probably a little conservative for some but I think I need to give partner some leeway as transportation rates to be problematic
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#5
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:36
gwnn, on Nov 2 2009, 03:15 PM, said:
The shape is all wrong??? Basically you promise 3 card support for any suit partner has. I would X with 6 HCP fewer and the same shape.
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#6
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:39
pooltuna, on Nov 2 2009, 10:36 PM, said:
gwnn, on Nov 2 2009, 03:15 PM, said:
The shape is all wrong??? Basically you promise 3 card support for any suit partner has. I would X with 6 HCP fewer and the same shape.
I guess he replied before the OP was edited and the hand put in.....
Harald
#7
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:41
#8
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:42
#9
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:43
#10
Posted 2009-November-02, 14:48
George Carlin
#11
Posted 2009-November-02, 16:39
Should show the strong bal. hand, if p passes the worst
that can happen is 2CX=, if he bids on, I will be fine as well.
It does not even matter, what p thinks the X to be.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#13
Posted 2009-November-03, 03:12
#14
Posted 2009-November-03, 08:47
Does a 2D cue now followed by a 2NT suggestion (e.g. if partner rebids hearts) strikes you all that bad...?
#15
Posted 2009-November-03, 08:54
If you want to suggest notrump, you could bid 2NT now.
#16
Posted 2009-November-03, 09:17
I would rather play 2♥ than 2NT.
If partner can make a move then I have an easy 3NT.
#17
Posted 2009-November-03, 16:37
gnasher, on Nov 3 2009, 04:12 AM, said:
Yes I agree, 16 would be the min.

Help
